ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2019
Diffusion-induced competitive two-site binding.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinetics of diffusion-influenced multisite phosphorylation with enzyme reactivation.Biopolymers · 2024Article
- Pore structure controls stability and molecular flux in engineered protein cages.Science advances · 2022Article
- Speed limits of protein assembly with reversible membrane localization.The Journal of chemical physics · 2021Article
- Cluster Channeling in Cascade Reactions.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021Article
- Multisite reversible association in membranes and solutions: From non-Markovian to Markovian kinetics.The Journal of chemical physics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The influence of diffusion on the kinetics of ligand binding to a macromolecule with two sites is considered for a simple model where, in the reaction-controlled limit, there is no cooperativity and hence the sites are independent. By applying our recently developed formalism to describe a network of coupled diffusion-influenced reactions, we show that the rate constants of chemical kinetics cannot just be renormalized. Rather a new reaction channel, which connects the two singly occupied states, must be introduced. The rate constants of this new channel depend on the committor or capture probability that a ligand that just dissociated from one site rebinds to the other. This result is rederived in an elementary way using the encounter complex model. Illustrative calculations are presented where the kinetics of the fractional saturation of one site is compared with that of a macromolecule that has only this site. If all sites are initially empty, then the second site slows down binding to the first due to competition between the sites. On the other hand, if the second site is initially occupied, the binding of the first site speeds up because of the direct diffusion-induced transitions between the two singly bound states.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.