Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30849436›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2019

ReStore: A wireless peripheral nerve stimulation system.

Vishnoukumaar Sivaji, Dane W Grasse, Seth A Hays, Jesse E Bucksot, Rahul Saini, Michael P Kilgard, Robert L Rennaker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical experience implanting a miniature externally powered vagus nerve stimulator.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vishnoukumaar SivajiThe University of Texas at Dallas, Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Bioengineering, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States; The University of Texas at Dallas, Texas Biomedical Device Center, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States.
Dane W GrasseThe University of Texas at Dallas, Texas Biomedical Device Center, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States.
Seth A HaysThe University of Texas at Dallas, Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Bioengineering, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States; The University of Texas at Dallas, Texas Biomedical Device Center, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States; The University of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral Brain Sciences, 800 West Campbell Road, GR41, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States.
Jesse E BucksotThe University of Texas at Dallas, Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Bioengineering, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States; The University of Texas at Dallas, Texas Biomedical Device Center, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States.
Rahul SainiTeliatry, Inc., 1301 N Plano Rd, Richardson, TX 75081, United States.
Michael P KilgardThe University of Texas at Dallas, Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Bioengineering, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States; The University of Texas at Dallas, Texas Biomedical Device Center, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States; The University of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral Brain Sciences, 800 West Campbell Road, GR41, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States.
Robert L RennakerThe University of Texas at Dallas, Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Bioengineering, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States; The University of Texas at Dallas, Texas Biomedical Device Center, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States; The University of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral Brain Sciences, 800 West Campbell Road, GR41, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, United States. Electronic address: renn@utdallas.edu.
Texas Biomedical Research Institute · USBioTelemetry (United States) · US

Funding

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired with Rehabilitative Training to Enhance PlasticityR01NS085167 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI KILGARD, MICHAEL P, RENNAKER, ROBERT L · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Evaluation of the Neuromodulatory Mechanisms of Vagus Nerve Stimulation to Improve Motor Rehabilitation after StrokeR01NS094384 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI HAYS, SETH ALANSON · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Enhancing Recovery after Chronic Bilateral Cervical Spinal Cord Injury with Targeted Plasticity TherapyR01NS103803 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI KILGARD, MICHAEL P, RENNAKER, ROBERT L · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085167NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094384NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS103803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing use of neuromodulation techniques to treat neurological disorders has motivated efforts to improve on the safety and reliability of implantable nerve stimulators. NEW

methodThe present study describes the ReStore system, a miniature, implantable wireless nerve stimulator system that has no battery or leads and is constructed using commercial components and processes. The implant can be programmed wirelessly to deliver charge-balanced, biphasic current pulses of varying amplitudes, pulse widths, frequencies, and train durations. Here, we describe bench and in vivo testing to evaluate the operational performance and efficacy of nerve recruitment. Additionally, we also provide results from a large-animal chronic active stimulation study assessing the long-term biocompatibility of the device.

resultsThe results show that the system can reliably deliver accurate stimulation pulses through a range of different loads. Tests of nerve recruitment demonstrate that the implant can effectively activate peripheral nerves, even after accelerated aging and post-chronic implantation. Biocompatibility and hermeticity tests provide an initial indication that the implant will be safe for use in humans. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Most commercially available nerve stimulators include a battery and wire leads which often require subsequent surgeries to address failures in these components. Though miniaturized battery-less stimulators have been prototyped in academic labs, they are often constructed using custom components and processes that hinder clinical translation.

conclusionsThe results from testing the performance and safety of the ReStore system establish its potential to advance the field of peripheral neuromodulation.

Indexed as

Peripheral NervesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDogsElectric Stimulation TherapyEquipment DesignFemaleHumansImplantable NeurostimulatorsMaleRabbitsSciatic NerveTelemetryVagus Nerve StimulationImplantable pulse generatorIntegrated electrodesNerve stimulatorNeuromodulationTelemetryWireless

Identifiers

PMID30849436
PMCPMC6529940
OpenAlexW2918211536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.