ArticlePloS one2019
Regeneration of esophagus using a scaffold-free biomimetic structure created with bio-three-dimensional printing.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering heterogeneous tissues and organs via multi-material bioprinting: Advances, challenges, and opportunities.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- Establishing a rabbit sham model of cervical esophageal surgery for circumferential esophageal transplantation.Clinical transplantation and research · 2026Article
- Scaffold-Free Bone Regeneration Through Collaboration Between Type IV Collagen and FBXL14.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- From Medical Imaging to Bioprinted Tissues: The Importance of Workflow Optimisation for Improved Cell Function.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025Review
- 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: current state-of-the-art and challenges towards system standardization and clinical translation.Biofabrication · 2025Review
- Understanding the cellular dynamics, engineering perspectives and translation prospects in bioprinting epithelial tissues.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Biomimetic model for computing missing data imputation and inconsistency reduction in pairwise comparisons matrices.PloS one · 2025Article
- Spherical Shell Bioprinting to Produce Uniform Spheroids with Controlled Sizes.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Decellularization and Their Significance for Tissue Regeneration in the Era of 3D Bioprinting.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Tissue Engineering for Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Tracts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Lessons learned from pre-clinical testing of xenogeneic decellularized esophagi in a rabbit model.iScience · 2022Article
- Soluble ECM promotes organotypic formation in lung alveolar model.Biomaterials · 2022Article
- Successful use of bio plugs for delayed bronchial closure after pneumonectomy in experimental settings.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Engineered Full Thickness Electrospun Scaffold for Esophageal Tissue Regeneration: From In Vitro to In Vivo Approach.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- 3D cell aggregate printing technology and its applications.Essays in biochemistry · 2021Review
- A narrative review of esophageal tissue engineering and replacement: where are we?Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
- Bile duct reconstruction using scaffold-free tubular constructs created by Bio-3D printer.Regenerative therapy · 2021Article
- Regenerative medicine for the upper gastrointestinal tract.Regenerative therapy · 2020Review
- Bone morphogenetic protein 2-enhanced osteogenic differentiation of stem cell spheres by regulation of Runx2 expression.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various strategies have been attempted to replace esophageal defects with natural or artificial substitutes using tissue engineering. However, these methods have not yet reached clinical application because of the high risks related to their immunogenicity or insufficient biocompatibility. In this study, we developed a scaffold-free structure with a mixture of cell types using bio-three-dimensional (3D) printing technology and assessed its characteristics in vitro and in vivo after transplantation into rats. Normal human dermal fibroblasts, human esophageal smooth muscle cells, human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells were purchased and used as a cell source. After the preparation of multicellular spheroids, esophageal-like tube structures were prepared by bio-3D printing. The structures were matured in a bioreactor and transplanted into 10-12-week-old F344 male rats as esophageal grafts under general anesthesia. Mechanical and histochemical assessment of the structures were performed. Among 4 types of structures evaluated, those with the larger proportion of mesenchymal stem cells tended to show greater strength and expansion on mechanical testing and highly expressed α-smooth muscle actin and vascular endothelial growth factor on immunohistochemistry. Therefore, the structure with the larger proportion of mesenchymal stem cells was selected for transplantation. The scaffold-free structures had sufficient strength for transplantation between the esophagus and stomach using silicon stents. The structures were maintained in vivo for 30 days after transplantation. Smooth muscle cells were maintained, and flat epithelium extended and covered the inner surface of the lumen. Food had also passed through the structure. These results suggested that the esophagus-like scaffold-free tubular structures created using bio-3D printing could hold promise as a substitute for the repair of esophageal defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.