A demonstration of modularity, reuse, reproducibility, portability and scalability for modeling and simulation of cardiac electrophysiology using Kepler Workflows.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Pei-Chi YangDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5753-1131
Shweta PurawatSan Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC), University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5183-2750
Pek U IeongDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, National Biomedical Computation Resource, Drug Design Data Resource (D3R), University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Mao-Tsuen JengDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4454-4299
Kevin R DeMarcoDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Igor VorobyovDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4767-5297
Andrew D McCullochDepartments of Bioengineering and Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1708-5675
Ilkay AltintasSan Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC), University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Rommie E AmaroDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, National Biomedical Computation Resource, Drug Design Data Resource (D3R), University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Colleen E ClancyDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6849-4885
Funding
National Biomedical Computation Resource - Competitive Revision SupplementP41GM103426 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AMARO, ROMMIE E · 2012 to 2019
$14.0M
Development of the Predictive NeuroCardiovascular SimulatorOT2OD026580 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CLANCY, COLLEEN E, GRANDI, ELEONORA · 2018 to 2021
$5.7M
In silico Safety PharmacologyR01HL128537 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CLANCY, COLLEEN E, SANTANA, LUIS F · 2016 to 2024
$5.7M
The Cardiac Atlas ProjectR01HL121754 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MCCULLOCH, ANDREW D., OMENS, JEFFREY H. · 2014 to 2023
$5.0M
Predictive multiscale in silico cardio-pharmacologyU01HL126273 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CLANCY, COLLEEN E · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
AN OPEN RESOURCE TO ADVANCE COMPUTER-AIDED DRUG DESIGNU01GM111528 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AMARO, ROMMIE E, GILSON, MICHAEL K. · 2014 to 2018
$3.6M
Analyzing the Cardiac Power Grid: Adaptive responses to fluctuating local demandU01HL122199 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BEARD, DANIEL A, DASH, RANJAN K · 2015 to 2019
$3.3M
A Systems Biology Approach to Study Cardiac Arrhythmias: iPS Cells and In Silico ModelingR01HL128170 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO, CLANCY, COLLEEN E · 2015 to 2018
$3.0M
Systems Biology of Hypertrophic Heart Disease from Molecular Pathways to Organ SystemR01HL137100 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MCCULLOCH, ANDREW D. · 2017 to 2020
Multi-scale computational modeling is a major branch of computational biology as evidenced by the US federal interagency Multi-Scale Modeling Consortium and major international projects. It invariably involves specific and detailed sequences of data analysis and simulation, often with multiple tools and datasets, and the community recognizes improved modularity, reuse, reproducibility, portability and scalability as critical unmet needs in this area. Scientific workflows are a well-recognized strategy for addressing these needs in scientific computing. While there are good examples if the use of scientific workflows in bioinformatics, medical informatics, biomedical imaging and data analysis, there are fewer examples in multi-scale computational modeling in general and cardiac electrophysiology in particular. Cardiac electrophysiology simulation is a mature area of multi-scale computational biology that serves as an excellent use case for developing and testing new scientific workflows. In this article, we develop, describe and test a computational workflow that serves as a proof of concept of a platform for the robust integration and implementation of a reusable and reproducible multi-scale cardiac cell and tissue model that is expandable, modular and portable. The workflow described leverages Python and Kepler-Python actor for plotting and pre/post-processing. During all stages of the workflow design, we rely on freely available open-source tools, to make our workflow freely usable by scientists.
Indexed as
Models, CardiovascularWorkflowComputer SimulationHeartHumansProof of Concept StudyReproducibility of Results
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
A demonstration of modularity, reuse, reproducibility, portability and scalability for modeling and simulation of cardiac electrophysiology using Kepler Workflows. · full record | OpenQuestion