Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30848928›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.)2019

E-Cigarette Chemistry and Analytical Detection.

Robert M Strongin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exposure to Toxic Compounds Using Alternative Smoking Products: Analysis of Empirical Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cannabis concentrate vaping chemistry.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Toxicity of waterpipe tobacco smoking: the role of flavors, sweeteners, humectants, and charcoal.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert M StronginDepartment of Chemistry, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon 97201, USA; email: strongin@pdx.edu.

Funding

Toxicant Production and Mitigation in the Electronic-Cigarette Reaction VesselR01ES025257 · NIEHS · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI STRONGIN, ROBERT M · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES025257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of e-cigarette aerosol properties can inform public health while longer-term epidemiological investigations are ongoing. The determination of aerosol levels of known toxins, as well as of molecules with unknown inhalation toxicity profiles, affords specific information for estimating the risks of e-cigarettes and for uncovering areas that should be prioritized for further investigation.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAerosolsChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalFlavoring AgentsGlycerolHumansNicotinePropylene GlycolPublic HealthAerosolsFlavoring AgentsGlycerolNicotinePropylene Glycolaerosolelectronic cigaretteflavoringglycerolharm reductionpropylene glycoltobacco

Identifiers

PMID30848928
PMCPMC6565477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.