Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30848557›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2019

Subacute fatigue in primary care - two sides of the story.

Katrin Hulme, Paul Little, Abigail Burrows, Anna Julia, Rona Moss-Morris

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of health psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katrin HulmeHealth Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Paul LittlePrimary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK.
Abigail BurrowsHealth Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Anna JuliaHealth Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Rona Moss-MorrisHealth Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2927-3446
King's College London · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-DG-1213-10001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFatigue is a common symptom in primary care. Chronic fatigue research highlights the value of preventing chronicity, but little research has investigated the early, subacute stage of the fatigue trajectory (<3 months). We aimed to examine patient and general practitioner (GP) perspectives of subacute fatigue in primary care: (1) to gain a better understanding of fatigue during this stage and (2) to explore how management could be improved.

designA qualitative study design was used. In-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 14 patients and 14 GPs (non-dyadic), recruited from 19 primary care practices.

methodsInterview transcripts were thematically analysed. Initially, patient and GP accounts were analysed separately, before themes were merged to identify shared and independent perspectives.

resultsThree main themes were identified. Within these, subthemes from patients', GPs', or shared patient/GP perspectives emerged. The main themes encompassed the following: (1) Change from normal - the impact of fatigue; (2) The challenges of managing fatigue; and (3) The consultation GPs' knowledge was often not reflected in patients' accounts, even for those reporting positive experiences, suggesting knowledge was not effectively translated.

conclusionsSome findings, such as impact, mirror those described in chronic fatigue. New insights into early-stage fatigue management also arose, including mismatches in patient and GP perceptions on negative tests and not re-presenting. These highlight the need for better communication and shared understanding. GPs should pre-emptively present a biopsychosocial model of fatigue and keep communication channels open, particularly in the light of negative physiological tests. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Patients with chronic fatigue retrospectively report lack of understanding from GPs in early stage of illness. Little research has investigated the early stages of the fatigue trajectory. What does this study add? Consequences of an episode of subacute fatigue are similar to those reported for CFS. There is discordance between GPs' positive view of negative tests and patients' need for explanation of symptoms. The length of appointments is a significant barrier for creating shared understanding.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultAgedCohort StudiesFatigueFeasibility StudiesFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchReferral and Consultationfatigueprimary carequalitative

Identifiers

PMID30848557
PMCPMC6519220
OpenAlexW2922373745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.