Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30848423›Full record

SynthesisClinical drug investigation2019

Benefits of Beta-Blockade in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review.

Young R Lee, Michael Sadanand Seth, Dylan Soney, Hanyu Dai

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical drug investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A nationwide analysis on the interaction between frailty and beta-blocker therapy in hip fracture patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Beta-blockers in septic shock: What is new?Journal of intensive medicine · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. [Pharmacological therapy of circulatory shock].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Beta-Adrenergic Blockade in Critical Illness.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Young R LeeDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 1718 Pine Street, Abilene, TX, 79601, USA. young.lee@ttuhsc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7677-2125
Michael Sadanand SethDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 1718 Pine Street, Abilene, TX, 79601, USA.
Dylan SoneyDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 1718 Pine Street, Abilene, TX, 79601, USA.
Hanyu DaiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 1718 Pine Street, Abilene, TX, 79601, USA.
Texas Tech University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis and septic shock are inflammatory disorders associated with high rates of mortality. Patients with sepsis and septic shock frequently become tachycardic as a result of the utilization of vasopressor therapy and cardiac overcompensation owing to hypotension, predisposing patients to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. Previously, it was thought that beta-blocker therapy in patients with sepsis would exacerbate hypotension; however, recent studies have shown that may not be the case.

objectiveThis review aims to ascertain whether beta-blocker therapy reduces heart rate in patients with sepsis without a corresponding decrease in blood pressure, and if beta-blockade has a beneficial effect on mortality.

methodsSeveral databases including Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were scoured for trials pertaining to the utilization of beta-blockers in sepsis and septic shock, and trials that were either prospective or controlled were included in this review.

resultsIn the initial search, 1839 articles were found, and those were subsequently reduced to 14 trials (five randomized controlled trials, nine non-randomized trials) that were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this review. All included trials displayed beneficial effects on heart rate without any detriments to blood pressure. Of the six trials that assessed mortality, four showed substantial benefits.

conclusionThe majority of the trials assessed in this review displayed beneficial results for beta-blocker use in patients with sepsis. However, owing to the deficit of large-scale randomized controlled trials addressing this topic, further research is needed to ensure the veracity of these results.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsBlood PressureHeart RateHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSepsisShock, SepticAdrenergic beta-Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID30848423
OpenAlexW2922334084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.