Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30848415›Full record

Trial reportJournal of abnormal child psychology2019

The Influence of Treatment Engagement on Positive Outcomes in the Context of a School-Based Intervention for Students with Externalizing Behavior Problems.

Michael A Lindsey, Meghan Romanelli, Mesha L Ellis, Edward D Barker, Caroline L Boxmeyer, John E Lochman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael A LindseyMcSilver Institute for Poverty Policy and Research, Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York, NY, USA. Michael.Lindsey@nyu.edu.
Meghan RomanelliMcSilver Institute for Poverty Policy and Research, Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Mesha L EllisEllis Evaluation & Consulting Services, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Edward D BarkerInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK.
Caroline L BoxmeyerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
John E LochmanDepartment of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.

Funding

Field Trial of Effects of the Coping Power ProgramR01DA016135 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI LOCHMAN, JOHN E · 2002 to 2006
$5.1M
SECONDARY PREVENTION OF SUBSTANCE USE IN HIGH RISK BOYSR01DA008453 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI LOCHMAN, JOHN E · 1993 to 2004
$3.0M
Morehouse School of Medicine (M-MIDARP)R24DA021527 · NIDA · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BRAITHWAITE, RONALD LLOYD · 2008 to 2012
$2.5M
CDC HHS R49\CCR418569National Institute of Drug Abuse DA-08453NIDA NIH HHS 3R24DA021527-01A2S1NIDA NIH HHS DA-16135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the stability of and cross-influences between externalizing behaviors and intervention engagement among children participating in a randomized clinical trial of an intervention for disruptive behavioral youth. Analyses also accounted for the influence of caregiver depression, family relationship quality, and sociodemographic factors (race, income) on the relationship between behaviors and intervention engagement. Analyses were based on 118 children participating in the Coping Power intervention. Composite variables were created to represent externalizing behaviors and intervention engagement constructs. Associations between these composite variables were examined over 24 treatment sessions. Findings indicated a regressive relationship among externalizing behaviors, i.e., baseline externalizing behaviors were positively associated with immediate follow-up behaviors. There were also dynamic relationships observed among engagement constructs. Notably, engagement with in-session activities during sessions 1-8 was positively associated with out-of-session activity engagement during the same treatment time period. Engagement with out-of-session activities during sessions 1-8 was positively associated with in-session activity engagement during sessions 9-16, indicating a complete mediation between early and middle in-session engagement through the mechanism of early out-of-session engagement. A crosslag relationship was observed: middle in-session engagement was negatively associated with externalizing behaviors at immediate follow-up. Finally, an interaction of race by income on immediate follow-up externalizing behaviors was observed, such that Black children's externalizing behaviors remain static regardless of income level while White children's behaviors decreased with higher income. Our findings support the contention that focusing on intervention engagement may be especially important in prevention interventions.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalBlack or African AmericanChild BehaviorCognitive Behavioral TherapyIncomeOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Acceptance of Health CareWhite PeopleAdolescentAggressionBehavioral SymptomsChildFemaleHumansJuvenile DelinquencyMaleCaregiver depressionChild behavior problemsEngagementFamily incomePrevention intervention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.