Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30848404›Full record

ArticleHeart failure reviews2019

Effects of European Society of Cardiology guidelines on medication profiles after hospitalization for heart failure in 22,476 Dutch patients: from 2001 until 2015.

Willemien J Kruik-Kollöffel, Gerard C M Linssen, H Joost Kruik, Kris L L Movig, Edith M Heintjes, Job van der Palen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart failure reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Differences in guideline-recommended heart failure medication between Dutch heart failure clinics: an analysis of the CHECK-HF registry.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Willemien J Kruik-KollöffelDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Saxenburgh Group, P.O. Box 1, 7770 AA, Hardenberg, the Netherlands. w.kruik@sxb.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-6204-9027
Gerard C M LinssenDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, the Netherlands.
H Joost KruikDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Kris L L MovigDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Edith M HeintjesPHARMO Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Job van der PalenMedical School Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prescriber adherence to guideline-recommended medication in patients with heart failure (HF) in clinical practice is suboptimal. We analyzed how evolving guideline recommendations influenced medication profiles after a first HF hospitalization. We extracted medication profiles from the Dutch PHARMO Database Network for 22,476 patients with a diagnosis of HF at hospital discharge between 2001 and 2015. The percentage of patients prescribed the combination of a beta-blocker (BB) and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) increased from 24 to approximately 45% within this 15-year period. The percentage of patients who also used a mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonist (MRA) reached approximately 20%. The probability of being prescribed these combinations decreased with increasing age. As a consequence of the policy change in the ESC guideline 2001, the use of BB increased from less than 40% in 2001 to about 70% by 2015. The percentage of patients prescribed an ACEI and/or an ARB, an MRA, or a diuretic was about stable, at respectively 63%, 37%, and 82%. Although the 2012 ESC guideline also advised MRA in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II, there was no increase in MRA prescriptions. Compliance with the ESC guidelines varied for the individual recommendations. Remarkably, there was no significant increase in MRA prescriptions. At the same time, developments were demonstrated, which were not instigated by the guidelines, like the shift from ACEI to ARB. Although the exact HF classification of our patients was unknown, given a relatively stable case mix, our data provide insight into "real-world" pharmacological management.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsCardiotonic AgentsDatabases, FactualDrug PrescriptionsDrug Therapy, CombinationDrug UtilizationFemaleGuideline AdherenceHeart FailureHospitalizationAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsCardiotonic AgentsMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsDrug therapyGuideline adherenceHealth plan implementationHeart failurePharmacoepidemiologyPractice guideline

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.