ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019
Two- and three-dimensional myocardial strain imaging in the interrogation of sex differences in cardiac mechanics of long-term survivors of childhood cancers.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D-based strain analysis and cardiotoxicity detection in cancer patients received chemotherapy.BMC cancer · 2023Review
- Childhood cancer survivorship in China: An overview of the past two decades.Cancer medicine · 2022Review
- Comprehensive evaluation of left ventricular deformation using speckle tracking echocardiography in normal children: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional approaches.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2022Article
- Three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography for the global and regional assessments of left ventricle myocardial deformation in breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to interrogate sex differences in cardiac mechanics using two-(2D) and three-(3D) dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in survivors of childhood cancers. 83 survivors (43 males) aged 25.6 ± 6.1 years at 16.0 ± 6.1 years after anthracycline therapy and 42 healthy controls (21 males) were studied. 2D STE was performed to assess LV linear deformation in three principal directions, while 3D STE was performed to assess LV ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), global radial strain (GRS), and global area strain (GAS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to to determine the usefulness of 2D and 3D echocardiographic indices to discriminate between survivors and controls. Survivors of both sex had significantly lower 2D and 3D strain indices compared with sex-specific controls (all p < 0.05). Among survivors, 2D GLS and GRS and all of the 3D indices were similar between males and females (all p > 0.05). Among cancer survivors, multivariate analysis revealed age at study (β = - 0.26, p = 0.022) as a significant determinant of 3D GLS. The area under the ROC curve for 3D GLS was the largest at 0.89 amongst all 3D and 2D strain parameters, while that of 2D GLS was 0.83. For 3D GLS, a cut-off of 16.4% had a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 80.7% of differentiating survivors from controls. Notwithstanding the finding of impaired LV myocardial mechanics, the present study did not reveal evidence of sexual dimorphism in cardiac mechanics in long term survivors of childhood cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.