ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2019
Initial phantom study on estimation of speed of sound in medium using coherence among received echo signals.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a 1 × 512 Ring Transducer Array-Based 3D Ultrasound Imaging System for Accurate Breast Lesion Detection: Phantom and Preliminary Clinical Feasibility Study.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Spatial Coherence-Based Sound Speed Estimation in Plane Wave Ultrasound Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics · 2026Article
- Spatial Ambiguity Correction in Coherence-Based Average Sound Speed Estimation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Article
- Relationship between transmission/reception conditions of high-frequency plane wave compounding and evaluation accuracy of extended amplitude envelope statistics.Japanese journal of applied physics (2008) · 2024Article
- Improvement of performance of minimum variance beamformer by introducing cross covariance estimate.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeUltrasound beamforming is required to obtain clinical ultrasound images. In the beamforming procedure, the distance between the receiving focal point and each transducer element is determined based on the assumed speed of sound in the tissue. However, the actual speed of sound in tissue is unknown and varies depending on the tissue type. To improve the performance of an ultrasonic beamformer by evaluating its focusing quality, the coherence factor (CF) was introduced in medical ultrasound imaging. The CF may be used to estimate the speed of sound in tissue because it can identify focusing errors in beamforming. In the present study, the feasibility of CF for estimating the speed of sound was examined through phantom experiments.
methodTo evaluate the dependency of CF on the assumed speed of sound in ultrasound beamforming, beamformed ultrasonic radio frequency (RF) signals and CFs were obtained at different assumed speeds of sound. CF is highest when the assumed speed of sound matches the true speed of sound in the medium. Therefore, the speed of sound in the medium was determined as the assumed speed of sound, which gives the highest CF. The proposed method was validated in a conventional line-by-line sequence with a focused transmit beam and ultrafast plane wave imaging.
resultsA homogeneous phantom (diffuse scattering medium) with a known speed of sound of 1540 m/s was used for validating the proposed method. Beamformed ultrasonic RF signals and CFs were obtained at an assumed speed of sound from 1480 to 1600 m/s varied at a pitch of 5 m/s. In the line-by-line sequence, CF reached the maximum at an assumed speed of sound of 1525.0 m/s (0.97% difference from the true value) when CFs at all spatial points in the region of interest (ROI) were averaged. On the other hand, the speed of sound was determined to be 1528.5 m/s (0.75% difference) when CFs at spatial points with CF-weighted echo amplitudes were larger than 20% of the maximum value. In plane wave imaging, the speed of sound was estimated to be 1544.5 m/s (0.29% difference) using CFs with CF-weighted echo amplitudes larger than 20% of the maximum value.
conclusionThe speed of sound of a homogeneous medium could be determined by the proposed method with errors of less than 1% using CFs obtained from ultrasonic echo signals selected based on the CF-weighted echo amplitudes, i.e., when echo signals with better signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30848399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.