ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics2019
Use of azilsartan medoxomil in the primary-care setting in Germany: A real-world evidence study .
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil in the treatment of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate azilsartan medoxomil (AZM) (Edarbi MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study among patients receiving AZM in the primary-care setting in Germany. Prescription patterns - including patient demographics, off-label use, use in specific populations, concomitant use of other antihypertensive drugs, and drugs potentially causing interactions with AZM - were analyzed in two periods (01/2012 - 12/2013 and 01/2014 - 11/2016) using the primary-care physician panel of German IMS
resultsIn total, 852 of 1,159 (74%) and 696 of 811 (86%) patients met the inclusion criteria for both periods, respectively. Approximately 25% of patients were aged ≥ 75 years; 1 patient was < 18 years old; ~ 50% were females. AZM was prescribed for the approved indication of essential hypertension in 83% and 68% of patients in the first and second period, while indication was missing in 12% and 26% of patients, respectively. AZM was coprescribed on the same day with other antihypertensive drugs in 23% (first period) and 37% (second period) of patients. Drugs that might cause an interaction with AZM were coprescribed on the same day in 3% of patients in both periods; overlapping prescription periods were detected in 14% (first period) and 8% (second period) of patients. Coprescription of AZM with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (2%) or aliskiren (< 1%) on the same day was rare in both periods. Overlapping prescription periods with AZM decreased from 20 to 6% for ACE inhibitors and from 8 to 1% for aliskiren.
conclusionFindings from this real-world evidence study demonstrate that AZM was generally utilized for approved indication and in accordance with the summary of product characteristics recommendations. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.