Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30848101›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA2019

Writing a wrong: Coupled RNA polymerase II transcription and RNA quality control.

Sarah A Peck, Katlyn D Hughes, Jose F Victorino, Amber L Mosley

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah A PeckDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Katlyn D HughesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Jose F VictorinoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Amber L MosleyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

BASIC SCIENCE STUDIES ON GENE THERAPY OF BLOOD DISEASEST32HL007910 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Roland W. Herzog, Reuben Kapur · 1999 to 2026
$7.6M
Regulation of RNA Polymerase II transcription by the phosphatase Rtr1R01GM099714 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOSLEY, AMBER L. · 2012 to 2021
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007910NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processing and maturation of precursor RNA species is coupled to RNA polymerase II transcription. Co-transcriptional RNA processing helps to ensure efficient and proper capping, splicing, and 3' end processing of different RNA species to help ensure quality control of the transcriptome. Many improperly processed transcripts are not exported from the nucleus, are restricted to the site of transcription, and are in some cases degraded, which helps to limit any possibility of aberrant RNA causing harm to cellular health. These critical quality control pathways are regulated by the highly dynamic protein-protein interaction network at the site of transcription. Recent work has further revealed the extent to which the processes of transcription and RNA processing and quality control are integrated, and how critically their coupling relies upon the dynamic protein interactions that take place co-transcriptionally. This review focuses specifically on the intricate balance between 3' end processing and RNA decay during transcription termination. This article is categorized under: RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Turnover/Surveillance Mechanisms RNA Processing > 3' End Processing RNA Processing > Splicing Mechanisms RNA Processing > Capping and 5' End Modifications.

Indexed as

RNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalTranscription, GeneticProtein Interaction MapsRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IIRNA PrecursorsRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IIRNA Precursors3′ end processingcappingco-transcriptionalquality controlRNAPIIRNA processingsplicingterminationtranscription

Identifiers

PMID30848101
PMCPMC6570551
OpenAlexW2922270573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.