Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30848041›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2019

Differentiating axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer patients: A comparison of radiomic signatures from multiparametric breast MR sequences.

Ruimei Chai, He Ma, Mingjie Xu, Dooman Arefan, Xiaoyu Cui, Yi Liu, Lina Zhang, Shandong Wu, Ke Xu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis using a magnetic resonance imaging radiomics model of invasive breast cancer primary tumor.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Update on DWI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ruimei ChaiDepartment of Radiology, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
He MaSino-Dutch Biomedical and Infornation Engineering School, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Mingjie XuSino-Dutch Biomedical and Infornation Engineering School, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Dooman ArefanImaging Research Division, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Xiaoyu CuiSino-Dutch Biomedical and Infornation Engineering School, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Radiology, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Lina ZhangDepartment of Radiology, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Shandong WuImaging Research Division, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ke XuDepartment of Radiology, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.

Funding

Quantitative assessment of breast MRIs for breast cancer risk predictionR01CA193603 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WU, SHANDONG · 2015 to 2018
$1.7M
Deep interpretation of mammographic images in breast cancer screeningR01CA218405 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WU, SHANDONG · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193603NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe axillary lymph node status is critical for breast cancer staging and individualized treatment planning. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of determining axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis by breast MRI-derived radiomic signatures, and compare the discriminating abilities of different MR sequences. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: In all, 120 breast cancer patients, 59 with ALN metastasis and 61 without metastasis, all confirmed by pathology. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 .0T scanner with T ASSESSMENT: Typical morphological and texture features of the segmented tumor were extracted from four sequences, ie, T STATISTICAL TESTS: Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher's exact test, least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) regression, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed.

resultsThe accuracy/AUC of the four sequences was 79%/0.87, 77%/0.85, 74%/0.79, and 79%/0.85 for the T DATA

conclusionBreast tumor's radiomic signatures from preoperative breast MRI sequences are associated with the ALN metastasis status, where CE2 phase and the contrast enhancement kinetic features lead to the highest classification effect. Level of Evidence 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1125-1132.

Indexed as

AdultAxillaBreastBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiesbreast cancerlymph nodesmagnetic resonance imagingmetastasis

Identifiers

PMID30848041
PMCPMC8579490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.