Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30847769›Full record

ArticleInfection2019

Diagnostic challenges in infective endocarditis: is PET/CT the solution?

Christopher Hohmann, Guido Michels, Matthias Schmidt, Roman Pfister, Navid Mader, Myriam Ohler, Lara Blanke, Nathalie Jazmati, Clara Lehmann, Jan Rybniker and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Patients with Artificial Heart Valves.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Review
  6. Endocarditis caused byIDCases · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. European heart journal. Case reports · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher HohmannDepartment III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Guido MichelsDepartment III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Matthias SchmidtDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Roman PfisterDepartment III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Navid MaderDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Myriam OhlerDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, KerpenerStraße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Lara BlankeDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, KerpenerStraße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Nathalie JazmatiInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Clara LehmannDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, KerpenerStraße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Jan RybnikerDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, KerpenerStraße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Sarah M FüngerDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, KerpenerStraße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Gerd FätkenheuerDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, KerpenerStraße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Norma JungDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, KerpenerStraße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. norma.jung@uk-koeln.de.
University Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEGerman Center for Infection Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite developments in both imaging and microbiological techniques, the final diagnosis of IE often remains challenging. In this single-center cohort study, we aimed to identify the specific indications for request of

methodsA total of 235 patients with possible (n = 43) or definite (n = 192) IE according to the revised Duke criteria were prospectively studied from July 2013 until December 2016. Echocardiography was generally used as the primary cardiac imaging technique. All patients were treated by a multidisciplinary Endocarditis Team. Diagnostics with

resultsIn 20 patients,

conclusionOur findings support the utility of

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesEndocarditis, BacterialFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProsthesis-Related InfectionsRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals18F-FDG-PET/CTBioprosthetic valveInfective endocarditisIntracardiac devicesMechanical valveMultidisciplinary Endocarditis Team

Identifiers

PMID30847769
OpenAlexW2912357499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.