Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30847702›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

Understanding the roles of patient symptoms and subjective appraisals in well-being among breast cancer patients.

Adrian N S Badana, Victoria R Marino, Maureen E Templeman, Susan C McMillan, Cindy S Tofthagen, Brent J Small, William E Haley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. A machine learning approach to profiling anxiety risk among cancer patients on treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. General Health and Resilience of Breast Cancer Patients: The Mediator Role of Affective Well-Being.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Coping experiences of women in the different phases of breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Clinically significant symptoms prevalence in breast and colon cancers and leukemia patients: a comparison analysis of patient-reported outcomes.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian N S BadanaSchool of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., MHC 1300, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. abadana@mail.usf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6257-1704
Victoria R MarinoSchool of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., MHC 1300, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Maureen E TemplemanSchool of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., MHC 1300, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Susan C McMillanCollege of Nursing, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., MDC Box 22, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Cindy S TofthagenDepartment of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Brent J SmallSchool of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., MHC 1300, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
William E HaleySchool of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., MHC 1300, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
University of South Florida · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute 4025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the roles of both patient symptoms, and subjective appraisals of stress (self-efficacy, symptom barriers, symptom distress), in understanding well-being (anxiety, depression, cancer-specific quality of life, mental health quality of life, and physical health quality of life) in breast cancer patients.

methodsWe examined data from 104 female breast cancer patients. Using a stress process model, we hypothesized that while high levels of patient symptoms would be associated with poorer patient well-being, these effects would be mediated by subjective appraisals, including patient self-efficacy, perceived symptom barriers, and symptom distress.

resultsAs expected, higher levels of patient symptoms were associated with poorer well-being on all five indicators. Subjective appraisals of stress added significantly to predictors of well-being, and were mediators of this relationship across all five outcomes.

conclusionsWhile patient symptoms are important predictors of patient well-being, subjective appraisals of the stressfulness of symptoms, and of patients' self-efficacy in managing symptoms, are also key factors. The findings suggest the utility of a stress process model in understanding well-being in breast cancer patients, and point to the potential value of targeting patient appraisals as well as symptoms to improve psychological well-being and quality of life.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeStress, PsychologicalBreast cancerCancer symptomsOncologyPsychological distressStress appraisalWell-being

Identifiers

PMID30847702
OpenAlexW2921754541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.