Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30847678›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2019

Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study.

Yassine Ochen, Herman Frima, R Marijn Houwert, Marilyn Heng, Mark van Heijl, Egbert J M M Verleisdonk, Detlef van der Velde

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. How to assess applicability and methodological quality of comparative studies of operative interventions in orthopedic trauma surgery.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. What are the long-term patient-reported and clinical outcomes after lateral clavicle fractures? A cross-sectional study of 619 patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Clavicular hook plate with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation by suture anchor in the treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Clavicle fractures in adults; current concepts.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Different inner fixation strategies for Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Yassine OchenDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. yassineochen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7187-2055
Herman FrimaDepartment of Surgery, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland.
R Marijn HouwertDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marilyn HengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Mark van HeijlDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Egbert J M M VerleisdonkDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Detlef van der VeldeDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLHarvard University · USKantonsspital Graubünden · CHSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDifferent fixation methods are used for treatment of unstable lateral clavicle fractures (LCF). Definitive consensus and guidelines for the surgical fixation of LCF have not been established. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation with the clavicle hook plate (CHP) and the superior clavicle plate with lateral extension (SCPLE).

methodsA dual-center retrospective cohort study was performed. All patients operatively treated for unstable Neer type II and type V LCF between 2011 and 2016, with the CHP (n = 23) or SCPLE (n = 53), were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the QuickDASH score. Secondary outcomes were the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score, complications, and implant removal.

resultsA total of 67 patients (88%) were available for the final follow-up. There was a significant difference in bicortical lateral fragment size, 15 mm (± 4, range 6-21) in the CPH group compared to 20 mm (± 8, range 8-43) in the SCPLE group (p ≤ 0.001). There was no significant difference in median QuickDASH score (CHP; 0.00 [IQR 0.0-0.0], SCPLE; 0.00 [IQR 0.0-4.5]; p = 0.073) or other functional outcome scores (NRS at rest; p = 0.373, NRS during activity; p = 0.559). There was no significant difference in median QuickDASH score or other functional outcome scores between Neer type II and type V fractures. There was no significant difference in complication rate, CHP 11% and SCPLE 8% (relative risk 1.26; [95% CI 0.25-6.33; p = 0.777]). The implant removal rate was 100% in the CHP group compared to 42% in the SCPLE group (relative risk 2.40; [95% CI 1.72-3.35; p ≤ 0.001]).

conclusionBoth the CHP and SCPLE are effective fixation methods for the treatment of unstable LCF, resulting in excellent patient-reported functional outcome and similar complication rates. SCPLE fixation is an effective fixation method for the treatment of both Neer type II and type V LCF. The SCPLE has a lower implant removal rate. Therefore, if technically feasible, we recommend SCPLE fixation for the treatment of unstable LCF.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesClavicleFracture Fixation, InternalOpen Fracture ReductionPostoperative ComplicationsAdultFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRadiographyRecovery of FunctionClavicle hook plateLateral clavicle fracturePlate fixationSuperior clavicle plate with lateral extensionUnstable

Identifiers

PMID30847678
PMCPMC6570672
OpenAlexW2922280370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.