ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2019
[Socioeconomic determinants of mortality for very old men in Austria].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Equal in ashes? Exploring socioeconomic inequalities in lifespan based on obituary data in Austria.SSM - population health · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough socioeconomic differences in the mortality of middle-aged persons is well-researched, little is known about socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in the very old population. Surveys and population census follow-up studies in this age group are associated with reliability and validity problems.
objectiveThe aim of the study was to investigate, by linking statistical information from register data, to what extent differences in mortality exist among very old Austrian men by socioeconomic variables (e.g. education and income) and if these can be explained by differences in health status. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe data records on men aged 80-99 years counted in the Austrian register-based population census from 2011 were augmented by information from tax and social security data and merged with deaths in a 5-year follow-up period. Relative mortality risks were estimated by Cox regression. The health status was operationalized by the standardized level of care.
resultsEven in very old men significant differences in mortality exist depending on the socioeconomic status. A systematic effect was found for education and a poverty effect for income. When controlling not just for age but also for the standardized level of care, no socioeconomic disparities in mortality were observed. The higher mortality risk for less educated and low income very old men is thus a result of a poorer health status.
conclusionAt ages over 80 years the health status is the essential influencing factor on mortality. Measures to reduce socioeconomic disparities in mortality must therefore focus on earlier phases in life, in order to reduce the extent of care dependency among socially disadvantaged groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30847545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.