ArticleSkeletal radiology2019
Diffusion tensor imaging of diabetic amyotrophy.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can DTI Evaluate Lumbosacral Plexus Nerve Integrity, and What can this Tell us About Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction? A Narrative Review.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Diffusion-weighted MR imaging and utility of ADC measurements in characterizing nerve and muscle changes in diabetic patients on ankle DWI studies: a cross-sectional study.European radiology · 2023Article
- Role of MR Neurography for Evaluation of the Lumbosacral Plexus: A Scoping Review.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2022Article
- Pathophysiology and Molecular Imaging of Diabetic Foot Infections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Diabetic Amyotrophy (Bruns-Garland Syndrome): A Narrative Review.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo qualitatively and quantitatively characterize the nerves of patients with diabetic amyotrophy (DA) using magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). MATERIALS AND
methodsForty controls and 13 DA cases were analyzed. 1.5-Tesla and 3.0-Tesla MRN with DTI was used. Qualitative data from 13 patient records were recorded. Region of interest (ROI) measurements were taken of bilateral L3 through S2 lumbosacral nerve roots, femoral nerves, and sciatic nerves. An ANOVA and multiple linear regression analysis were performed. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated between two readers.
resultsIn DA cases, abnormalities of the lumbosacral nerve roots (n = 11 patients), sciatic (n = 10), femoral (n = 13), and obturator nerves (n = 4) were seen; denervation changes of the abdominopelvic muscles were also identified. Quantitatively, minimum and mean nerve signals on B600 were significantly less than controls (p < 0.001). Minimum and mean ADC values were significantly greater in cases than in controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002 respectively). Mean fractional anisotropy (FA) values were significantly lower in cases than in controls (p = 0.041). There were no significant differences in the minimum FA values between cases and controls. Minimum and mean ADCs correlated positively with highest recorded hemoglobin A1 (HbA1c) while controlling for sex, age, and BMI (β = 0.518, p < 0.001 and β = 0.302, p = 0.020 respectively). ICCs were 0.892 (B600), 0.717 (ADC), and 0.730 (FA).
conclusionNeuromuscular lesions secondary to DA are qualitatively and quantitatively identified on MRN with DTI, and a positive correlation of ADC levels with serum HbA1c levels exists. Thus, MRN with DTI can be employed as a non-invasive diagnostic tool, if DA is suspected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.