Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30847382›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2019

Comparison of Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

Yi Su, Shaney Flores, Guoqiao Wang, Russ C Hornbeck, Benjamin Speidel, Nelly Joseph-Mathurin, Andrei G Vlassenko, Brian A Gordon, Robert A Koeppe, William E Klunk and 35 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Prognostic value of plasma brain-derived pTau.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Characterizing amyloid and tau positron emission tomography-based stages across the clinical continuum.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparison of amyloid chronicity and EYO in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Integrating Machine Learning and Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors for the Early Detection of Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. A brief history of Aβ imaging.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

45 authors.

Yi SuBanner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Shaney FloresDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Guoqiao WangKnight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Russ C HornbeckDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Benjamin SpeidelDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nelly Joseph-MathurinDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Andrei G VlassenkoDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Brian A GordonDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Robert A KoeppeDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
William E KlunkDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Clifford R JackDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Martin R FarlowDepartment of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Stephen SallowayButler Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Barbara J SniderKnight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Sarah B BermanDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Erik D RobersonDepartment of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jared BroschDepartment of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ivonne Jimenez-VelazquesUniversity of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Christopher H van DyckYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Douglas GalaskoUniversity of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Shauna H YuanUniversity of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Suman JayadevUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lawrence S HonigColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Serge GauthierMcGill Center for Studies in Aging, Douglas Mental Health Research Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Ging-Yuek R HsiungUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mario MasellisSunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
William S BrooksThe University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael FulhamUniversity of Sydney and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Roger ClarnetteUniversity of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Colin L MastersThe University of Melbourne and the Florey Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
David WallonInserm U1245, Department of Neurology and CNR-MAJ, Rouen, France.
Didier HannequinInserm U1245, Department of Neurology and CNR-MAJ, Rouen, France.
Bruno DuboisUniversity Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris, Paris, France.
Jeremie ParienteUniversity of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Raquel Sanchez-ValleHospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Catherine MummeryUniversity College London, London, UK.
John M RingmanKeck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michel BottlaenderService Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, Orsay, France.
Gregory KleinF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Switzerland.
Smiljana Milosavljevic-RisticF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Switzerland.
Eric McDadeKnight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Chengjie XiongKnight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
John C MorrisKnight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Randall J BatemanKnight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Tammie L S BenzingerDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN MORRIS · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
Imaging CoreU19AG032438 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2010 to 2025
$53.9M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG005681 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 1985 to 2019
$52.1M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHINDLER, SUZANNE ELIZABETH · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
VASCULAR RISK AND COGNITIVE STATUS IN A LATINO POPULATIONP50AG005142 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ARANDA, MARIA P. · 1985 to 2019
$41.0M
DIAN-TU Next Generation Prevention Trial - Data Request Management SupplementR01AG053267 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2017 to 2023
$34.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG019610 · NIA · SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GONZALEZ HERNANDEZ, GRACIELA · 2001 to 2020
$32.5M
Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network Trials Unit - Adaptive Prevention TrialR01AG046179 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2014 to 2019
$26.6M
Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer NetworkUF1AG032438 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2014 to 2017
$21.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NIA NIH HHS K01 AG053474NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P30 AG019610NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005142NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005681NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031581NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046179NIA NIH HHS R01 AG052550NIA NIH HHS R01 AG053267NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055444NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058676NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG064937NIA NIH HHS U01 AG042791NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009352NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS048056NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS098577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionQuantitative

methodsPittsburgh compound B and florbetapir amyloid PET imaging data from three different cohorts were analyzed using previously established pipelines to obtain global amyloid burden measurements. These measurements were converted to the Centiloid scale to allow fair comparison between the two tracers. The mean and inter-individual variability of the two tracers were compared using multivariate linear models both cross-sectionally and longitudinally.

resultsGlobal amyloid burden measured using the two tracers were strongly correlated in both cohorts. However, higher variability was observed when florbetapir was used as the imaging tracer. The variability may be partially caused by white matter signal as partial volume correction reduces the variability and improves the correlations between the two tracers. Amyloid burden measured using both tracers was found to be in association with clinical and psychometric measurements. Longitudinal comparison of the two tracers was also performed in similar but separate cohorts whose baseline amyloid load was considered elevated (i.e., amyloid positive). No significant difference was detected in the average annualized rate of change measurements made with these two tracers. DISCUSSION: Although the amyloid burden measurements were quite similar using these two tracers as expected, difference was observable even after conversion into the Centiloid scale. Further investigation is warranted to identify optimal strategies to harmonize amyloid imaging data acquired using different tracers.

Indexed as

Amyloid imagingCentiloidFlorbetapirPiBPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID30847382
PMCPMC6389727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.