ArticleFrontiers in oncology2019
Association Between
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational identification of rare pathogenic genomic variants in esophageal cancer markers: Transcript-level analysis, sequence-based insights, and structural-functional impacts of non-synonymous SNPs.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of SNPs Screening for Platinum-Related Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics Genes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for Precision Medicine.The application of clinical genetics · 2025Review
- KIAA1549 promotes the development and chemoresistance of colorectal cancer by upregulating ERCC2.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2024Article
- Role of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Genes Implicated in Capecitabine Pharmacodynamics on the Effectiveness of Adjuvant Therapy in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Haplotypes of single cancer driver genes and their local ancestry in a highly admixed long-lived population of Northeast Brazil.Genetics and molecular biology · 2022Article
- Effect ofAmerican journal of translational research · 2020Article
- Genetic Polymorphisms and the Efficacy of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: Review.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal cancer (EC) is a very aggressive tumor, and no reliable prognostic markers exist especially for resectable advanced neoplasia. The principal aim of this study was to investigate the association of germline polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway genes with the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced EC. As a second aim, we also studied the association of NER gene variants with response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Among the EC patients referred to our Institution between 2004 and 2012, we selected a cohort of 180 patients diagnosed with a clinical tumor stage ranging from IIB and IVA. Patients were genotyped for four NER variants, two in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.