Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30847090›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Extensive secondary contact among three glacial lineages of Arctic Char (

Sarah J Salisbury, Gregory R McCracken, Donald Keefe, Robert Perry, Daniel E Ruzzante

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Conservation Units for Anadromous Arctic Char (Evolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. "Evolutionary applications · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah J SalisburyDepartment of Biology Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7637-7742
Gregory R McCrackenDepartment of Biology Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.
Donald KeefeDepartment of Environment and Conservation Corner Brook Newfoundland and Labrador Canada.
Robert PerryDepartment of Environment and Conservation Corner Brook Newfoundland and Labrador Canada.
Daniel E RuzzanteDepartment of Biology Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8536-8335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe Pleistocene glaciation event prompted the allopatric divergence of multiple glacial lineages of Arctic char ( LOCATION: Labrador and Newfoundland, Canada.

methodsWe sequenced a portion of the D-loop region in over 1,000 Arctic char (

resultsWithin Labrador, the Arctic and Atlantic lineages were widespread. Two locations (one landlocked and one with access to the sea) also contained individuals of the Acadian lineage, constituting the first record of this lineage in Labrador. Atlantic and Acadian lineage individuals were found in both eastern and western Newfoundland. Multiple sampling locations in Labrador and Newfoundland contained fish of two or more different glacial lineages, implying their introgression. Glacial lineage did not appear to dictate contemporary genetic divergence between the pale and dark morph of char present in Gander Lake, Newfoundland. Both were predominately of the Atlantic lineage, suggesting the potential for their divergence in sympatry. MAIN

conclusionsOur study reveals Labrador and Newfoundland to be a unique junction of three glacial lineages which have likely hybridized extensively in this region.

Indexed as

Arctic charglacial refugiaintrogressionmitochondrial DNANorth Americaphylogeographysecondary contact

Identifiers

PMID30847090
PMCPMC6392391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.