Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30846790›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Considering tumour volume for motion corrected DWI of colorectal liver metastases increases sensitivity of ADC to detect treatment-induced changes.

Ryan Pathak, Jingduo Tian, Neil A Thacker, David M Morris, Hossein Ragheb, Charles Saunders, Mark Saunders, Alan Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Recommendations for improved reproducibility of ADC derivation on behalf of the Elekta MRI-linac consortium image analysis working group.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryan PathakUniversity of Manchester, Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester, UK. ryan.pathak@alumni.manchester.ac.uk.
Jingduo TianUniversity of Manchester, Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester, UK.
Neil A ThackerUniversity of Manchester, Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester, UK.
David M MorrisUniversity of Manchester, Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester, UK.
Hossein RaghebUniversity of Manchester, Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester, UK.
Charles SaundersUniversity of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, UK.
Mark SaundersThe Christie Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Alan JacksonUniversity of Manchester, Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1623-0383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ADC is a potential post treatment imaging biomarker in colorectal liver metastasis however measurements are affected by respiratory motion. This is compounded by increased statistical uncertainty in ADC measurement with decreasing tumour volume. In this prospective study we applied a retrospective motion correction method to improve the image quality of 15 tumour data sets from 11 patients. We compared repeatability of ADC measurements corrected for motion artefact against non-motion corrected acquisition of the same data set. We then applied an error model that estimated the uncertainty in ADC repeatability measurements therefore taking into consideration tumour volume. Test-retest differences in ADC for each tumour, was scaled to their estimated measurement uncertainty, and 95% confidence limits were calculated, with a null hypothesis that there is no difference between the model distribution and the data. An early post treatment scan (within 7 days of starting treatment) was acquired for 12 tumours from 8 patients. When accounting for both motion artefact and statistical uncertainty due to tumour volumes, the threshold for detecting significant post treatment changes for an individual tumour in this data set, reduced from 30.3% to 1.7% (95% limits of agreement). Applying these constraints, a significant change in ADC (5

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingOrgan MotionAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID30846790
PMCPMC6405765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.