ArticleScientific reports2019
Shape fidelity and structure of 3D printed high consistency nanocellulose.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A low-cost imaging platform for quantitative characterisation of scaffold surface macrotopography with potential application in craniofacial tissue engineering.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Article
- Gelatin Methacryloyl/Sodium Alginate/Cellulose Nanocrystal Inks and 3D Printing for Dental Tissue Engineering Applications.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing of Lignocellulose Structures: Improving Mechanical Properties and Shape Fidelity.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Direct ink writing of high-resolution cellulose structures.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Additively-Manufactured High-Concentration Nanocellulose Composites: Structure and Mechanical Properties.Polymers · 2023Article
- Tailoring bioinks of extrusion-based bioprinting for cutaneous wound healing.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- Deconstruction and Reassembly of Renewable Polymers and Biocolloids into Next Generation Structured Materials.Chemical reviews · 2021Review
- 3D-Printable Nanocellulose-Based Functional Materials: Fundamentals and Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Recent advances in 3D printing of nanocellulose: structure, preparation, and application prospects.Nanoscale advances · 2021Review
- Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.Chemical reviews · 2020Review
- Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability.Biofabrication · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the additive manufacturing process for high consistency nanocellulose. Unlike thermoformable plastics, wood derived nanocelluloses are typically processed as aqueous dispersions because they are not melt-processable on their own. The ability to use nanocellulose directly in additive manufacturing broadens the possibilities regarding usable raw materials and achievable properties thereof. Modern additive manufacturing systems are capable of depositing nanocellulose with micrometer precision, which enables the printing of accurate three-dimensional wet structures. Typically, these wet structures are produced from dilute aqueous fibrillar dispersions. As a consequence of the high water content, the structures deform and shrink during drying unless the constructs are freeze-dried. While freeze-drying preserves the geometry, it results in high porosity which manifests as poor mechanical and barrier properties. Herein, we study an additive manufacturing process for high consistency enzymatically fibrillated cellulose nanofibers in terms of printability, shape retention, structure, and mechanical properties. Particular emphasis is placed on quantitative shape analysis based on 3D scanning, point cloud analysis, and x-ray microtomography. Despite substantial volumetric as well as anisotropic deformation, we demonstrate repeatability of the printed construct and its properties.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.