Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30846741›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Previously published drug interaction models predict loss of response for transoesophageal echocardiography sedation well but not response to oesophageal instrumentation.

Fu-Wei Su, Chien-Kun Ting, Jing-Yang Liou, Yi-Chang Chen, Mei-Yung Tsou, Shen-Chih Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fu-Wei SuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shipai Road, Beitou District, Taipei City, 11217, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chien-Kun TingDepartment of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shipai Road, Beitou District, Taipei City, 11217, Taiwan, Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3156-8139
Jing-Yang LiouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shipai Road, Beitou District, Taipei City, 11217, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yi-Chang ChenBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, 195, Sec. 4, Chung Hsing Road, Chutung, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Mei-Yung TsouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shipai Road, Beitou District, Taipei City, 11217, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Shen-Chih WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shipai Road, Beitou District, Taipei City, 11217, Taiwan, Republic of China. akkwang@gmail.com.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response surface models (RSMs) were used to predict effects of multiple drugs interactions. Our study was aimed to validate accuracy of the previous published volunteer models during transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). This is a cross-sectional study with 20 patients scheduled for transesophageal echocardiography in Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan. Effect-site concentration pairs of alfentanil and propofol were recorded and converted to equivalent remifentanil and propofol effect-site concentrations. Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores were assessed every 2 minutes. Using these data, previous published models of loss of response (LOR), intolerable ventilatory depression (IVD), and loss of response to esophageal instrumentation (LREI) were then estimated. Accuracy of prediction is assessed by calculating the difference between the true response and the model-predicted probability. Clinical events such as interruption of TEE were recorded. The average procedure time was 11 minutes. Accuracy for prediction of LOR and LREI is 63.6% and 38.5%, respectively. There were four patients experienced desaturation for less than 1 minute, which were not predicted by IVD model, and one interruption of TEE due to involuntary movement. The previous published drug-interaction RSMs predict LOR well but not LREI for TEE sedation. Further studies using response surface methodology are needed to improve quality for TEE sedation and clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, TransesophagealAgedAlfentanilAnesthetics, IntravenousCross-Sectional StudiesDrug InteractionsEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProcedural SedationPropofolTaiwanAlfentanilAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofol

Identifiers

PMID30846741
PMCPMC6405922
OpenAlexW2920208945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.