Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30846554›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Predictability of human differential gene expression.

Megan Crow, Nathaniel Lim, Sara Ballouz, Paul Pavlidis, Jesse Gillis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Cross-Species and Sex-Specific Meta-Analysis of Transcriptomic Studies of Pulmonary Hypertension.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Latent spaces for tumour transcriptomes.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transcriptome-wide characterization of genetic perturbations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Megan CrowStanley Center for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724.ORCID 0000-0002-1172-5897
Nathaniel LimDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Sara BallouzStanley Center for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724.
Paul PavlidisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Jesse GillisStanley Center for Cognitive Genomics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724; jgillis@cshl.edu.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Neuroinformatics for gene expression: networks, function and meta-analysisR01MH111099 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI PAVLIDIS, PAUL · 2016 to 2025
$3.6M
Revealing the transcriptomic basis of neuronal identity through functional meta-analysisR01MH113005 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI GILLIS, JESSE · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Heuristics to evaluate biomedical and genomic knowledge bases for validityR01LM012736 · NLM · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI GILLIS, JESSE · 2017 to 2020
$1.9M
Meta-analysis to define neuronal diversity: from genes to functions across speciesF32MH114501 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI CROW, MEGAN · 2017 to 2018
$111k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH114501NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111099NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113005NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential expression (DE) is commonly used to explore molecular mechanisms of biological conditions. While many studies report significant results between their groups of interest, the degree to which results are specific to the question at hand is not generally assessed, potentially leading to inaccurate interpretation. This could be particularly problematic for metaanalysis where replicability across datasets is taken as strong evidence for the existence of a specific, biologically relevant signal, but which instead may arise from recurrence of generic processes. To address this, we developed an approach to predict DE based on an analysis of over 600 studies. A predictor based on empirical prior probability of DE performs very well at this task (mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, ∼0.8), indicating that a large fraction of DE hit lists are nonspecific. In contrast, predictors based on attributes such as gene function, mutation rates, or network features perform poorly. Genes associated with sex, the extracellular matrix, the immune system, and stress responses are prominent within the "DE prior." In a series of control studies, we show that these patterns reflect shared biology rather than technical artifacts or ascertainment biases. Finally, we demonstrate the application of the DE prior to data interpretation in three use cases: (

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHuman GeneticsProbabilityAdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsElectronic Data ProcessingFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, EssentialGenomicsGraft RejectionHumansKidney TransplantationLung NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumordifferential expressionmetaanalysisreplicabilityspecificitytranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID30846554
PMCPMC6442595
OpenAlexW2921170286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.