ArticleBMJ quality & safety2019
Development and performance evaluation of the Medicines Optimisation Assessment Tool (MOAT): a prognostic model to target hospital pharmacists' input to prevent medication-related problems.
Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction tools to prioritise hospitalised adult patients at risk of drug related problems: An umbrella review.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Managing emergency department patients with potential medication-related harm: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Article
- Developing the Inpatient Mental Health Pharmaceutical Assessment and Care Tool (IMPACT) for use by UK mental health pharmacy teams-a modified Delphi study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a clinical score to identify hospitalised patients at high risk of drug-related problems.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Drug Related Problems among Older Inpatients at a Tertiary Care Setting.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Enhancing the clinical pharmacy service of a large teaching hospital: Development of a new clinical prioritisation tool.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Comparison of prioritisation algorithms for the selection of patients for medication reviews in the emergency department: a cross-sectional study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
- Prioritizing patients for medication review by emergency department pharmacists: a multi-method study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
- Medication risk checklist for older adults (LOTTA) - development and validation of a self-assessment tool.Annals of medicine · 2023Article
- Systematic Review of Risk Factors Assessed in Predictive Scoring Tools for Drug-Related Problems in Inpatients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Development of Screening Tools to Predict Medication-Related Problems Across the Continuum of Emergency Department Care: A Prospective, Multicenter Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Patient prioritisation for hospital pharmacy services: current approaches in the UK.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021Article
- A pilot study to identify elderly patients with cognitive impairment for clinical pharmacist polypharmacy review in General Practice.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2021Article
- Identifying medication harm in hospitalised patients: a bimodal, targeted approach.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2020Article
- High-risk medicines associated with clinically relevant medication-related problems in UK hospitals: A prospective observational study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMedicines optimisation is a key role for hospital pharmacists, but with ever-increasing demands on services, there is a need to increase efficiency while maintaining patient safety.
objectiveTo develop a prediction tool, the Medicines Optimisation Assessment Tool (MOAT), to target patients most in need of pharmacists' input in hospital.
methodsPatients from adult medical wards at two UK hospitals were prospectively included into this cohort study. Data on medication-related problems (MRPs) were collected by pharmacists at the study sites as part of their routine daily clinical assessments. Data on potential risk factors, such as number of comorbidities and use of 'high-risk' medicines, were collected retrospectively. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to determine the relationship between risk factors and the study outcome: preventable MRPs that were at least moderate in severity. The model was internally validated and a simplified electronic scoring system developed.
resultsAmong 1503 eligible admissions, 610 (40.6%) experienced the study outcome. Eighteen risk factors were preselected for MOAT development, with 11 variables retained in the final model. The MOAT demonstrated fair predictive performance (concordance index 0.66) and good calibration. Two clinically relevant decision thresholds (ie, the minimum predicted risk probabilities to justify pharmacists' input) were selected, with sensitivities of 90% and 66% (specificity 30% and 61%); these equate to positive predictive values of 47% and 54%, respectively. Decision curve analysis suggests that the MOAT has potential value in clinical practice in guiding decision-making.
conclusionThe MOAT has potential to predict those patients most at risk of moderate or severe preventable MRPs, experienced by 41% of admissions. External validation is now required to establish predictive accuracy in a new group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.