Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30846478›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2019

Identification of Rigosertib for the Treatment of Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa-Associated Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Velina S Atanasova, Celine Pourreyron, Mehdi Farshchian, Michael Lawler, Christian A Brown, Stephen A Watt, Sheila Wright, Michael Warkala, Christina Guttmann-Gruber, Josefina Piñón Hofbauer and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Transcriptome-Guided Drug Repurposing for Aggressive SCCs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Investigational Treatments for Epidermolysis Bullosa.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2021
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Epidermolysis bullosa.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Velina S Atanasova *Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Celine Pourreyron *Division of Cellular Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Mehdi FarshchianDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michael LawlerDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Christian A BrownDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Stephen A WattDivision of Cellular Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Sheila WrightDivision of Cellular Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Michael WarkalaDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Christina Guttmann-GruberEB House Austria, Research Program for Molecular Therapy of Genodermatoses, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8232-5068
Josefina Piñón HofbauerEB House Austria, Research Program for Molecular Therapy of Genodermatoses, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8558-9031
Ignacia FuentesFundación DEBRA Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Marco PriscoDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Elham RashidghamatSt. John's Institute of Dermatology, King's College London (Guy's Campus), London, United Kingdom.
Cristina HasDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Julio C Salas-AlanisInstituto Dearmatologico de Jalisco, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Francis PalissonFundación DEBRA Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Alain HovnanianINSERM UMR 1163, Paris, France.
John A McGrathSt. John's Institute of Dermatology, King's College London (Guy's Campus), London, United Kingdom.
Jemima E MellerioSt. John's Institute of Dermatology, King's College London (Guy's Campus), London, United Kingdom.
Johann W BauerEB House Austria, Research Program for Molecular Therapy of Genodermatoses, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria.
Andrew P SouthDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Andrew.south@Jefferson.edu.
Thomas Jefferson University · USEB House Austria · ATKing's College London · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversidad del Desarrollo · CLInserm · FRSecretaría de Salud de Jalisco · MXUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

X-Ray Crystallography and Macromolecular CharacterizationP30CA056036 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Chapman · 1995 to 2026
$94.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA056036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSquamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin is the leading cause of death in patients with the severe generalized form of the genetic disease recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). Although emerging data are identifying why patients suffer this fatal complication, therapies for treatment of RDEB SCC are in urgent need.

resultsON-01910 (or rigosertib) exhibited significant specificity for RDEB SCC: in culture rigosertib induced apoptosis in 10 of 10 RDEB SCC keratinocyte populations while only slowing the growth of normal primary skin cells at doses 2 orders of magnitude higher. Furthermore, rigosertib significantly inhibited the growth of two RDEB SCC in murine xenograft studies with no apparent toxicity. Mechanistically, rigosertib has been shown to inhibit multiple signaling pathways. Comparison of PLK1 siRNA with MEK inhibition, AKT inhibition, and the microtubule-disrupting agent vinblastine in RDEB SCC shows that only PLK1 reduction exhibits a similar sensitivity profile to rigosertib.

conclusionsThese data support a "first in RDEB" phase II clinical trial of rigosertib to assess tumor targeting in patients with late stage, metastatic, and/or unresectable SCC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Cycle ProteinsEpidermolysis Bullosa DystrophicaGene Knockdown TechniquesGenes, RecessiveGlycineHumansKeratinocytesMolecular Targeted TherapyPolo-Like Kinase 1Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingAntineoplastic AgentsCell Cycle ProteinsGlycineON 01910Polo-Like Kinase 1Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingSulfones

Identifiers

PMID30846478
PMCPMC8185613
OpenAlexW2920803700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.