Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30846435›Full record

Observational studyAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2019

Gadolinium-Enhanced Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis: Optimizing the Recognition of Active Plaques for Different MR Imaging Sequences.

L L F do Amaral, D C Fragoso, R H Nunes, I A Littig, A J da Rocha

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

L L F do AmaralFrom the Division of Neuroradiology (L.L.F.A, D.C.F., R.H.N., I.A.L., A.J.R.), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil neuro.medimagem@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2944-9947
D C FragosoFrom the Division of Neuroradiology (L.L.F.A, D.C.F., R.H.N., I.A.L., A.J.R.), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8458-428X
R H NunesFrom the Division of Neuroradiology (L.L.F.A, D.C.F., R.H.N., I.A.L., A.J.R.), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2483-964X
I A LittigFrom the Division of Neuroradiology (L.L.F.A, D.C.F., R.H.N., I.A.L., A.J.R.), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8343-1281
A J da RochaFrom the Division of Neuroradiology (L.L.F.A, D.C.F., R.H.N., I.A.L., A.J.R.), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2591-9171
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeGadolinium SWI is MR imaging that has recently been reported to be effective in the evaluation of several neurologic disorders, including demyelinating diseases. Our aim was to analyze the accuracy of gadolinium SWI for detecting the imaging evidence of active inflammation on MS plaques when a BBB dysfunction is demonstrated by a focal gadolinium-enhanced lesion and to compare this technique with gadolinium-enhanced T1 spin-echo and T1 spin-echo with magnetization transfer contrast. MATERIALS AND

methodsMR imaging studies of 103 patients (170 examinations) were performed using a 1.5T scanner. Two neuroradiologists scrutinized signal abnormalities of the demyelinating plaques on gadolinium SWI and compared them with gadolinium T1 before and after an additional magnetization transfer pulse. Interrater agreement was evaluated among gadolinium T1 magnetization transfer contrast, gadolinium SWI, and gadolinium T1 spin-echo using the κ coefficient. The T1 magnetization transfer contrast sequence was adopted as the criterion standard in this cohort. Thus, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for gadolinium T1 spin-echo and gadolinium SWI sequences.

resultsDifferences in BBB dysfunction were evident among gadolinium SWI, gadolinium T1 spin-echo, and gadolinium T1 magnetization transfer contrast. Gadolinium T1 magnetization transfer contrast demonstrated the highest number of active demyelinating plaques. Gadolinium SWI was highly correlated with gadolinium T1 magnetization transfer contrast in depicting acute demyelinating plaques (κ coefficient = 0.860; sensitivity = 0.837), and these techniques provided better performance compared with gadolinium T1 spin-echo (κ coefficient = 0.78; sensitivity = 0.645).

conclusionsGadolinium SWI was able to better detect BBB dysfunction in MS plaques and had a better performance than gadolinium T1 spin-echo. Increasing SWI sequence applications in clinical practice can improve our knowledge of MS, likely allowing the addition of BBB dysfunction analysis to the striking findings of the previously reported central vein sign.

Indexed as

GadoliniumAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainCohort StudiesContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNeuroimagingRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaGadolinium

Identifiers

PMID30846435
PMCPMC7048498
OpenAlexW2921928513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.