Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30846018›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2019

Perceptions of water and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption habits among teens, parents and teachers in the rural south-western USA.

Julia Meredith Hess, Emily A Lilo, Theresa H Cruz, Sally M Davis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Salud publica de Mexico · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia Meredith Hess1University of New Mexico Prevention Research Center,Department of Pediatrics,MSC 11 6145,1 University of New Mexico,Albuquerque,NM 87131,USA.
Emily A Lilo2Division of Health and Exercise Science,Western Oregon University,Monmouth,OR,USA.
Theresa H Cruz1University of New Mexico Prevention Research Center,Department of Pediatrics,MSC 11 6145,1 University of New Mexico,Albuquerque,NM 87131,USA.
Sally M Davis1University of New Mexico Prevention Research Center,Department of Pediatrics,MSC 11 6145,1 University of New Mexico,Albuquerque,NM 87131,USA.
University of New Mexico · USWestern Oregon University · US

Funding

Transdisciplinary Research, Equity and Engagement Center for Advancing Behavioral HealthU54MD004811 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CACARI STONE, LISA MARIE · 2017 to 2022
$8.7M
Village Interventions and Venues for Action II (VIVA II): Dissemination and Implementation of Evidence-Based Interventions to Prevent Chronic Diseases in Rural New MexicoU48DP005034 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI DAVIS, SALLY M · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005034NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD004811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present research aimed to describe perceptions and behaviours around the consumption of water and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) by youths.

designA formative, qualitative study which conducted four focus groups. Transcripts were analysed and themes related to reasons youths drink SSB and water, and conversely do not drink SSB and water, were analysed to reveal thematic clusters around sensory factors, environment and policy, access, marketing and role model influences, and health risks.

settingA rural, tri-ethnic community in New Mexico, USA.ParticipantsMiddle- and high-school students, parents and teachers.

resultsAlthough youths and adults were aware of the health risks of soda, they did not translate this information to other SSB, including sports drinks and sweetened tea. Moreover, their perceptions of risks of dyes outweighed their concern with sugar. Youths and adults were aware of water's health benefits, but they focused on short-term benefits. Youths and adults perceived water as unappealing. Adults were also concerned with water safety and access.

conclusionsThis formative research has implications for decreasing SSB consumption and simultaneously increasing water intake among youths in rural communities. Addressing unique access and safety concerns related to water in rural communities, as well as increasing awareness of the risks of all types of SSB, can work together in a positive feedback loop to change perceptions and behaviours with long-term health consequences. Specific policy suggestions include strengthening school policies to restrict all types of SSB and water promotion efforts that address access, safety and health benefits.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterSugar-Sweetened BeveragesAdolescentAdultFeeding BehaviorFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleParentsPerceptionRural PopulationSchool TeachersSouthwestern United StatesStudentsDrinking WaterHealth behaviourRuralSugar-sweetened beveragesWaterYouths

Identifiers

PMID30846018
PMCPMC6553465
OpenAlexW2921773176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.