ArticleBMC cancer2019
A multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) comparing the quality of life between laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric Cancer (study protocol).
Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03393182 (A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Quality of Life Between Laparoscopy-assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric cancer_KLASS 07), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Quality of Life Between Laparoscopy-assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric cancer_KLASS 07 (CKLASS01)(Korea-China Collaborated Study)
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Omentum-Preserving Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Morbidity and quality of life of totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial (CKLASS01).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025Trial
- Morbidity and Mortality After Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy to Treat Gastric Cancer: An Interim Report: A Phase III Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial (The KLASS-07 Trial).Journal of gastric cancer · 2024Trial
- Article
- Current clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery in China.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Quality of Life of Braun Anastomosis in Gastrointestinal Reconstruction in Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Article
- Exploring ideal operative time for best outcomes in gastric cancer surgery: A multi-institutional study based on KLASS-07 database.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023Article
- Comparison of short-term efficacy between totally laparoscopic gastrectomy and laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Preventive Action of Rivaroxaban against Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients after Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Short- and long-term oncological outcomes of totally laparoscopic gastrectomy versus laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021Article
- [Reconstruction following gastrectomy].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Review
- Article
- Progress of Gastric Cancer Surgery in the era of Precision Medicine.International journal of biological sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKLASS (the Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study) is a time-honored study group that has established laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal disease in Korea and has performed some important studies for the rationale of laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. A multi-center RCT (randomized controlled trial) to compare the quality of life (QOL) of patients undergoing totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer, named as KLASS 07, has been currently prepared in Korea.
methodsPatients diagnosed as gastric cancer, with clinical stage IA (T1N0M0) or IB (T1N1M0 / T2N0M0) according to the 7th edition of the Americal Joint Committee on Cancer System, were randomized to receive either TLDG or LADG. For surgical quality control, the surgeons participating in this trial had to have performed at least 50 gastrectomies and at least 30 gastrectomies annually (regardless of open or laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer). The patients who are allocated to TLDG group undergo intracorporeal anastomosis and those who are assigned to LADG undergo extracorporeal anastomosis for gastrointestinal reconstruction. DISCUSSION: Thirty-one surgeons from 26 institutions were engaged in this trial. The primary endpoint is 30-day morbidity, and secondary endpoint is QOL assessed by the questionnaire score. The KLASS 07 trial is the first multi-center RCT to investigate whether there are significant and quantifiable differences between the QOL of TLDG and LADG. The findings from this trial are expected to be the critical clues for designing the detailed procedures during laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer.
trial registrationThe protocol of KLASS 07 (CKLASS 01) was registered in http://register.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03393182 (Date of registration: January 2nd, 2018.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.