Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30845991›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2019

GSK3β regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell properties in triple-negative breast cancer.

Geraldine Vidhya Vijay, Na Zhao, Petra Den Hollander, Mike J Toneff, Robiya Joseph, Mika Pietila, Joseph H Taube, Tapasree R Sarkar, Esmeralda Ramirez-Pena, Steven J Werden and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The cross-talk between GSK-3β, RKIP, and PTEN as potential targets for therapeutic implications in cancer: a comprehensive insight.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Geraldine Vidhya VijayDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Na ZhaoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Petra Den HollanderDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mike J ToneffDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Robiya JosephDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mika PietilaTurku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku, Tykistökatu 6, 20520, Turku, Finland.
Joseph H TaubeDepartment of Biology, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
Tapasree R SarkarCenter for Statistical Bioinformatics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Esmeralda Ramirez-PenaDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Steven J WerdenDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Maryam ShariatiDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ruli GaoDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Mary SobieskiCenter for Translational Cancer Research, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Houston, TX, USA.
Clifford C StephanCenter for Translational Cancer Research, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Houston, TX, USA.
Nathalie SphyrisDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Noayuki MiuraDepartment of Biochemistry, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Peter DaviesCenter for Translational Cancer Research, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Houston, TX, USA.
Jeffrey T ChangDepartment of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, School of Biomedical Informatics, UT Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Rama SoundararajanDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jeffrey M RosenDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. jrosen@bcm.edu.
Sendurai A ManiDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. mani@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5918-4276
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · USBaylor University · USHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPTexas A&M University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Research Education and Career Horizons ProgramK12GM084897 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SIFERS, RICHARD NORMAN, SLAUGHTER, GAYLE · 2008 to 2016
$8.3M
Pleiotropic functions of FOXC2 in EMT, stem cells and breast cancer progressionR01CA155243 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MANI, SENDURAI AYYAVOO · 2011 to 2022
$3.2M
National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute 2R01CA155243NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155243NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM084897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTriple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs), which lack receptors for estrogen, progesterone, and amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor 2, are highly aggressive. Consequently, patients diagnosed with TNBCs have reduced overall and disease-free survival rates compared to patients with other subtypes of breast cancer. TNBCs are characterized by the presence of cancer cells with mesenchymal properties, indicating that the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a major role in the progression of this disease. The EMT program has also been implicated in chemoresistance, tumor recurrence, and induction of cancer stem cell (CSC) properties. Currently, there are no targeted therapies for TNBC, and hence, it is critical to identify the novel targets to treat TNBC.

methodsA library of compounds was screened for their ability to inhibit EMT in cells with mesenchymal phenotype as assessed using the previously described Z-cad reporters. Of the several drugs tested, GSK3β inhibitors were identified as EMT inhibitors. The effects of GSK3β inhibitors on the properties of TNBC cells with a mesenchymal phenotype were assessed using qRT-PCR, flow cytometry, western blot, mammosphere, and migration and cell viability assays. Publicly available datasets also were analyzed to examine if the expression of GSK3β correlates with the overall survival of breast cancer patients.

resultsWe identified a GSK3β inhibitor, BIO, in a drug screen as one of the most potent inhibitors of EMT. BIO and two other GSK3β inhibitors, TWS119 and LiCl, also decreased the expression of mesenchymal markers in several different cell lines with a mesenchymal phenotype. Further, inhibition of GSK3β reduced EMT-related migratory properties of cells with mesenchymal properties. To determine if GSK3β inhibitors target mesenchymal-like cells by affecting the CSC population, we employed mammosphere assays and profiled the stem cell-related cell surface marker CD44+/24- in cells after exposure to GSK3β inhibitors. We found that GSK3β inhibitors indeed decreased the CSC properties of cell types with mesenchymal properties. We treated cells with epithelial and mesenchymal properties with GSK3β inhibitors and found that GSK3β inhibitors selectively kill cells with mesenchymal attributes while sparing cells with epithelial properties. We analyzed patient data to identify genes predictive of poor clinical outcome that could serve as novel therapeutic targets for TNBC. The Wnt signaling pathway is critical to EMT, but among the various factors known to be involved in Wnt signaling, only the higher expression of GSK3β correlated with poorer overall patient survival.

conclusionsTaken together, our data demonstrate that GSK3β is a potential target for TNBCs and suggest that GSK3β inhibitors could serve as selective inhibitors of EMT and CSC properties for the treatment of a subset of aggressive TNBC. GSK3β inhibitors should be tested for use in combination with standard-of-care drugs in preclinical TNBC models.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCell MovementDatasets as TopicDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleGlycogen Synthase Kinase 3 betaHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Lithium ChlorideNeoplastic Stem CellsProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesPyrrolesSurvival AnalysisTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsGlycogen Synthase Kinase 3 betaGSK3B protein, humanLithium ChlorideProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesPyrrolesTWS 119Cancer stem cells (CSCs)Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)Glycogen synthase kinase β (GSK3β)Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)Wnt signaling

Identifiers

PMID30845991
PMCPMC6407242
OpenAlexW2921965589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.