Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30845361›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Effects of proton pump inhibitors, esomeprazole and vonoprazan, on the disposition of proguanil, a CYP2C19 substrate, in healthy volunteers.

Ryohkan Funakoshi, Yukana Tomoda, Toshiyuki Kudo, Kenichi Furihata, Hiroyuki Kusuhara, Kiyomi Ito

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Optimal Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ryohkan FunakoshiResearch Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Musashino University, Nishitokyo-shi, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1897-9689
Yukana TomodaLaboratory of Molecular Pharmacokinetics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiyuki KudoResearch Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Musashino University, Nishitokyo-shi, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6010-7617
Kenichi FurihataP-One Clinic, Keikokai Medical Corporation, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki KusuharaLaboratory of Molecular Pharmacokinetics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyomi ItoResearch Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Musashino University, Nishitokyo-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
Musashino University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPKishokai Medical Corporation · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsVonoprazan, a new class of potassium-competitive proton pump inhibitors has been found to attenuate the antiplatelet function of clopidogrel in a recent clinical study, despite weak in vitro activity against CYP2C19. To elucidate the mechanism of this interaction, the present study investigated the effects of esomeprazole and vonoprazan on the pharmacokinetics of proguanil, a CYP2C19 substrate.

methodsSeven healthy male volunteers (CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers) received a single oral administration of 100 mg proguanil/250 mg atovaquone (control phase), oral esomeprazole (20 mg) for 5 days followed by proguanil/atovaquone (esomeprazole phase) and oral vonoprazan (20 mg) for 5 days followed by proguanil/atovaquone (vonoprazan phase). Concentrations of proguanil and its metabolite, cycloguanil, in plasma and urine in each phase were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

resultsCoadministration with proton pump inhibitors resulted in increase and decrease in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of proguanil and cycloguanil, respectively, significantly reducing their AUC ratio (cycloguanil/proguanil) to 0.317-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.256-0.379) and 0.507-fold (95% CI 0.409-0.605) in esomeprazole phase and vonoprazan phase, respectively. Esomeprazole and vonoprazan also significantly reduced the apparent formation clearance (cumulative amount of cycloguanil in urine divided by AUC of proguanil) to 0.324-fold (95% CI 0.212-0.436) and 0.433-fold (95% CI 0.355-0.511), respectively, without significant changes in renal clearance of proguanil and cycloguanil.

conclusionsAlthough further studies are needed, both esomeprazole and vonoprazan potentially inhibit CYP2C19 at clinical doses, suggesting caution in the coadministration of these drugs with CYP2C19 substrates.

Indexed as

AdultArea Under CurveAtovaquoneChromatography, LiquidCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Drug CombinationsEsomeprazoleHumansMaleProguanilProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamidesTandem Mass SpectrometryTriazinesYoung Adult1-(5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)-N-methylmethanamineAtovaquoneatovaquone, proguanil drug combinationcycloguanilCYP2C19 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Drug CombinationsEsomeprazoleProguanilProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamidesTriazinescytochrome P450drug interactionsdrug metabolism

Identifiers

PMID30845361
PMCPMC6595331
OpenAlexW2921030913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.