ArticlePloS one2019
Thermopneumatic suction integrated microfluidic blood analysis system.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in MEMS Actuators for Microfluidic Applications: Emerging Designs, Multiphysics Modeling, and Performance Optimization.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Blood Biomarker Detection Using Integrated Microfluidics with Optical Label-Free Biosensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Sample-to-answer lateral flow assay with integrated plasma separation and NT-proBNP detection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Passively driven microfluidic device with simple operation in the development of nanolitre droplet assay in nucleic acid detection.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Blood Plasma Self-Separation Technologies during the Self-Driven Flow in Microfluidic Platforms.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- An Overview on Microfluidic Systems for Nucleic Acids Extraction from Human Raw Samples.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Disposable Polymeric Nanostructured Plasmonic Biosensors for Cell Culture Adhesion Monitoring.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- A Noninvasive Wearable Device for Real-Time Monitoring of Secretion Sweat Pressure by Digital Display.iScience · 2020Article
- Flow analysis on microcasting with degassed polydimethylsiloxane micro-channels for cell patterning with cross-linked albumin.PloS one · 2020Article
- Rapid Prototyping of an Open-Surface Microfluidic Platform Using Wettability-Patterned Surfaces Prepared by an Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma Jet.ACS omega · 2019Article
- Rapid and Safe Isolation of Human Peripheral Blood B and T Lymphocytes through Spiral Microfluidic Channels.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood tests provide crucial diagnostic information regarding several diseases. A key factor that affects the precision and accuracy of blood tests is the interference of red blood cells; however, the conventional methods of blood separation are often complicated and time consuming. In this study, we devised a simple but high-efficiency blood separation system on a self-strained microfluidic device that separates 99.7 ± 0.3% of the plasma in only 6 min. Parameters, such as flow rate, design of the filter trench, and the relative positions of the filter trench and channel, were optimized through microscopic monitoring. Moreover, this air-difference-driven device uses a cost-effective and easy-to-use heater device that creates a low-pressure environment in the microchannel within minutes. With the aforementioned advantages, this blood separation device could be another platform choice for point-of-care testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.