Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30845165›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Microlearning for patient safety: Crew resource management training in 15-minutes.

Benedict Gross, Leonie Rusin, Jan Kiesewetter, Jan M Zottmann, Martin R Fischer, Stephan Prückner, Alexandra Zech

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Microlearning in Diverse Contexts: A Bibliometric Analysis.TechTrends : for leaders in education & training · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benedict GrossInstitute for Emergency Medicine and Management in Medicine, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1639-1483
Leonie RusinInstitute for Emergency Medicine and Management in Medicine, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan KiesewetterInstitute for Medical Education, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan M ZottmannInstitute for Medical Education, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martin R FischerInstitute for Medical Education, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stephan PrücknerInstitute for Emergency Medicine and Management in Medicine, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexandra ZechInstitute for Emergency Medicine and Management in Medicine, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe sought to establish the feasibility of chunking crew resource management (CRM) training into micro-size interventions and to compare different training approaches in the context of micro-learning.

designWe evaluated whether participants in micro-learning CRM activities achieved learning objectives following training. In a between-subjects design, groups were observed for behaviour during a simulation that was part of a 15-minute modular intervention and tested for recollection afterwards.

participantsThe 129 participants recruited for this study were medical students, who already had relevant experience treating patients.

interventionsThe experimental setting involved three 5-minute components: video, simulation, and debriefing. Different groups viewed videos involving different didactic concepts: one group observed a videotaped concrete example of a medical care team applying a CRM tool (example group), and one group observed a videotaped lecture on the same topic (lecture group).

main outcome measuresAll simulations were videotaped and coded in detail for the occurrence of and time spent engaging in team behaviour and medical care. Questionnaires were administered before, immediately after, and two weeks after the intervention. We compared the groups' behaviour during the simulation (team cooperation and medical care), retention of knowledge from the training content, and results of the evaluation.

resultsBoth groups exhibited most of the behaviours included in the content of the instructional videos during the simulations and recollected information 2 weeks later. The example group exhibited significantly more of the training content during the simulation and demonstrated better retention 2 weeks later. Although the example group spent more time on team coordination, there was no difference in the number of executed medical measures.

conclusionDelivering CRM training in chunks of relatively short and highly standardised interventions appears feasible. In this study, the form of didactical presentation caused a difference in learning success between groups: a traditional lecture was outperformed by an instructional video demonstrating a practical example.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalAdultCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMalePatient Care TeamPatient SafetySimulation TrainingStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30845165
PMCPMC6405193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.