Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30844778›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019

Fast gamma-ray interaction-position estimation using k-d tree search.

Xin Li, Li Tao, Craig S Levin, Lars R Furenlid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xin LiCenter for Gamma-Ray Imaging and College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States of America.
Li TaoMolecular Imaging Instrumentation Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States of America.
Craig S LevinMolecular Imaging Instrumentation Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States of America.
Lars R FurenlidCenter for Gamma-Ray Imaging and College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States of America.

Funding

CENTER FOR GAMMA RAY IMAGINGP41EB002035 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BARRETT, HARRISON H, FURENLID, LARS R · 2003 to 2018
$17.7M
SPECT Imaging and Parallel ComputingR01EB000803 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CAUCCI, LUCA · 2012 to 2020
$4.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002035NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a fast gamma-ray interaction-position estimation method using k-d tree search, which can be combined with various kinds of closeness metrics such as Euclidean distance, maximum-likelihood estimation, etc. Compared with traditional search strategies, this method can achieve both speed and accuracy at the same time using the k-d tree data structure. The k-d tree search method has a time complexity of [Formula: see text], where N is the number of entries in the reference data set, which means large reference datasets can be used to efficiently estimate each event's interaction position. This method's accuracy was found to be equal to that of the exhaustive search method, yielding the highest achievable accuracy. Most importantly, this method has no restriction on the data structure of the reference dataset and can still work with complicated mean-detector-response functions (MDRFs), meaning that it is more robust than other popular methods such as contracting-grid-search (CG) or vector-search (VS) methods that could yield locally optimal instead of globally optimal results.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGamma RaysScintillation Counting

Identifiers

PMID30844778
PMCPMC7035761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.