ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2019
Perspectives of Patients in Identifying Their Values-Based Health Priorities.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Self-care needs in an aged population living with a chronic condition or multimorbidity: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators for shared decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2021Pooled it
- Shared decision-making with patients with limited health literacy - experiences and needs of GPs regarding values clarification.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Perceived Connections Between Personal Values and Health in High-Risk Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring caregiver perspectives on health service delivery priorities for individuals with complex care needs: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Leveraging an Electronic Health Record Patient Portal to Help Patients Formulate Their Health Care Goals: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Pilot Interventions.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Patient Priorities-Aligned Care for Older Adults With Multiple Conditions: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Acceptability and use of an online health priorities self-identification tool for older adults: A qualitative investigation.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Operationalizing the Chronic Care Model with Goal-Oriented Care.The patient · 2023Article
- Persons living with dementia and multiple chronic conditions identifying health priorities with care partners.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
- Towards patient-centred communication in the management of older patients' medications across transitions of care: A focused ethnographic study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2022Article
- Better care for older Hispanics: Identifying priorities and harmonizing care.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- Assessing What Matters Most in Older Adults With Multicomplexity.The Gerontologist · 2022Article
- Goal-oriented care for patients with chronic conditions or multimorbidity in primary care: A scoping review and concept analysis.PloS one · 2022Article
- Health Priorities in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Adapting a whole health model to home-based primary care: Bridging person-driven priorities with veteran and family-centered geriatric care.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2021Article
- Measuring Adoption of Patient Priorities-Aligned Care Using Natural Language Processing of Electronic Health Records: Development and Validation of the Model.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- "Hopes and wishes": Goals of high-need, high-cost older patients and their caregivers.Patient education and counseling · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPatient Health Priorities Identification (PHPI) is a values-based process in which trained facilitators assist older adults with multiple chronic conditions identify their health priorities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' perceptions of PHPI.
designQualitative study using thematic analysis.
settingIn-depth semistructured telephone and in-person interviews.
participantsTwenty-two older adults who participated in the PHPI process. MEASUREMENTS: Open-ended questions about patient perceptions of the PHPI process, perceived benefits of the process, enablers and barriers to PHPI, and recommendations for process enhancement.
resultsPatient interviews ranged from 9 to 63 minutes (median = 20 min; interquartile range = 15-26). The mean age was 80 years (standard deviation = 7.96), 64% were female, and all patients identified themselves as white. Of the sample, 73% reported no caregiver involvement in their healthcare; 36% lived alone. Most patients felt able to complete the PHPI process with ease. Perceived benefits included increased knowledge and insight into disease processes and treatment options, patient activation, and enhanced communication with family and clinicians. Patients identified several factors that were both enablers and barriers to PHPI including facilitator characteristics, patient demographic and clinical characteristics, social support, relationships between the patient and their primary care provider, and the changing health priorities of the patient. Recommendations for process enhancement included more frequent and flexible facilitator contacts, selection of patients for participation based on specific patient characteristics, clarification of process aims and expectations, involvement of family, written reminders of established health priorities, short duration between facilitation and primary care provider follow-up, and the inclusion of health-related tasks in facilitation visits.
conclusionsPatients found the PHPI process valuable in identifying actionable health priorities and healthcare goals leading to enhanced knowledge, activation, and communication regarding their treatment options and preferences. PHPI may be useful for aligning the healthcare that patients receive with their values-based priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.