Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30843873›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical investigation2019

Innate gene signature distinguishes humoral versus cytotoxic responses to influenza vaccination.

Eléna Gonçalves, Olivia Bonduelle, Angèle Soria, Pierre Loulergue, Alexandra Rousseau, Marine Cachanado, Henri Bonnabau, Rodolphe Thiebaut, Nicolas Tchitchek, Sylvie Behillil and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Nanocarriers for Skin Applications: Where Do We Stand?Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Eléna GonçalvesSorbonne Université, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses - Paris (Cimi-Paris), INSERM U1135, Paris, France.
Olivia BonduelleSorbonne Université, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses - Paris (Cimi-Paris), INSERM U1135, Paris, France.
Angèle SoriaSorbonne Université, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses - Paris (Cimi-Paris), INSERM U1135, Paris, France.
Pierre LoulergueUniversité Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Centre d'Investigation Clinique Cochin Pasteur, INSERM CIC 1417, French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network, Innovative Clinical Research Network in Vaccinology, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
Alexandra RousseauDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Research Platform of East of Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Marine CachanadoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Research Platform of East of Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Henri BonnabauINSERM U1219, INRIA SISTM, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux France.
Rodolphe ThiebautINSERM U1219, INRIA SISTM, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux France.
Nicolas TchitchekCEA - Université Paris Sud 11 - INSERM U1184, Immunology of Viral Infections and Autoimmune Diseases, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Sylvie BehillilInstitut Pasteur, CNR des Virus des Infections Respiratoires, Département de Virologie and Centre National de Recherche Scientifique UMR CNRS 3569, Paris, France.
Sylvie van der WerfInstitut Pasteur, CNR des Virus des Infections Respiratoires, Département de Virologie and Centre National de Recherche Scientifique UMR CNRS 3569, Paris, France.
Annika VogtSorbonne Université, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses - Paris (Cimi-Paris), INSERM U1135, Paris, France.
Tabassome SimonDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Research Platform of East of Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Odile LaunayUniversité Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Centre d'Investigation Clinique Cochin Pasteur, INSERM CIC 1417, French Clinical Research Infrastructure Network, Innovative Clinical Research Network in Vaccinology, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
Behazine CombadièreSorbonne Université, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses - Paris (Cimi-Paris), INSERM U1135, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRSorbonne Université · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystems vaccinology allows cutting-edge analysis of innate biomarkers of vaccine efficacy. We have been exploring novel strategies to shape the adaptive immune response, by targeting innate immune cells through novel immunization routes.

methodsThis randomized phase I/II clinical study (n=60 healthy subjects aged 18-45 years old) used transcriptomic analysis to discover early biomarkers of immune response quality after transcutaneous (t.c.), intradermal (i.d.), and intramuscular (i.m.) administration of a trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV season 2012-2013) (1:1:1 ratio). Safety and immunogenicity (hemagglutinin inhibition (HI), microneutralization (MN) antibodies and CD4, CD8 effector T cells) were measured at baseline Day (D)0 and at D21. Blood transcriptome was analyzed at D0 and D1.

resultsTIV-specific CD8+GranzymeB+(GRZ) T cells appeared in more individuals immunized by the t.c. and i.d. routes, while immunization by the i.d. and i.m. routes prompted high levels of HI antibody titers and MN against A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 influenza viral strains. The early innate gene signature anticipated immunological outcome by discriminating two clusters of individuals with either distinct humoral or CD8 cytotoxic responses. Several pathways explained this dichotomy confirmed by nine genes and serum level of CXCL10 were correlated with either TIV-specific cytotoxic CD8+GRZ+ T-cell or antibody responses. A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that these nine genes and serum levels of CXCL10 (D1/D0) best foreseen TIV-specific CD8+GRZ+ T-cell and antibody responses at D21.

conclusionThis study provides new insight into the impact of immunization routes and innate signature in the quality of adaptive immune responses.

Indexed as

Immunity, HumoralAdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesChemokine CXCL10FemaleGene Expression ProfilingGranzymesHumansImmunity, CellularInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAntibodies, ViralChemokine CXCL10CXCL10 protein, humanGranzymesInfluenza VaccinesClinical practiceImmunologyInfluenzaInnate immunityVaccines

Identifiers

PMID30843873
PMCPMC6486343
OpenAlexW2919306344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.