Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30843703›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2019

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of repeated implementation intention formation on adolescent smoking initiation: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Mark Conner, Sarah Grogan, Robert West, Ruth Simms-Ellis, Keira Scholtens, Bianca Sykes-Muskett, Lisa Cowap, Rebecca Lawton, Christopher J Armitage, David Meads and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Theory-based Trial to Promote Uptake and Sustained Use of Face Coverings During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mark ConnerSchool of Psychology.
Sarah GroganDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-7510-765X
Robert WestInstitute of Health Sciences.
Ruth Simms-EllisSchool of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-1010-6648
Keira ScholtensFaculty of Health Sciences.
Bianca Sykes-MuskettSchool of Psychology.
Lisa CowapFaculty of Health Sciences.ORCID 0000-0002-8876-0260
Rebecca LawtonSchool of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-5832-402X
Christopher J ArmitageManchester Centre for Health Psychology.
David MeadsInstitute of Health Sciences.
Laetitia SchmittCentre for Health Economics.
Carole TorgersonSchool of Education.
Kamran SiddiqiDepartment of Health Sciences.ORCID 0000-0003-1529-7778

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J000264/1Medical Research Council; National Prevention Research InitiativeNational Institute for Health Research; Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveForming implementation intentions (if-then plans) about how to refuse cigarette offers plus antismoking messages was tested for reducing adolescent smoking.

methodCluster randomized controlled trial with schools randomized (1:1) to receive implementation intention intervention and messages targeting not smoking (intervention) or completing homework (control). Adolescents (11-12 years at baseline) formed implementation intentions and read messages on 8 occasions over 4 years meaning masking treatment allocation was not possible. Outcomes were: follow-up (48 months) ever smoking, any smoking in last 30 days, regular smoking, and breath carbon monoxide levels. Analyses excluded baseline ever smokers, controlled for clustering by schools and examined effects of controlling for demographic variables. Economic evaluation (incremental cost effectiveness ratio; ICER) was conducted. Trial is registered (ISRCTN27596806).

resultsSchools were randomly allocated (September-October 2012) to intervention (

conclusionsThis pragmatic trial supports the use of repeated implementation intentions about how to refuse the offer of a cigarette plus antismoking messages as an effective and cost-effective intervention to reduce smoking initiation in adolescents. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorCost-Benefit AnalysisIntentionOutcome Assessment, Health CareSmokingAdolescentChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleSmoking Prevention

Identifiers

PMID30843703
PMCPMC6474716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.