ArticleCancer medicine2019
Disparities in colorectal cancer screening in New York City: An analysis of the 2014 NYC Community Health Survey.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening in South Asian Immigrants: A Systematic Review.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Pooled it
- Colorectal cancer screening: results from the World Trade Center Health Registry cohort.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Improving Guideline-Recommended Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC): Implementing a Patient Navigation and Practice Facilitation Intervention to Promote Health Equity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer screening in New York City.Journal of medical screening · 2023Article
- Disaggregating Racial and Ethnic Data: A Step Toward Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Disaggregating Racial and Ethnic Data: A Step Toward Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023Article
- A Community-Based Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors in Chinese Immigrants Residing in a Major Metropolitan Area.Journal of community medicine & public health · 2023Article
- Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Russian-speaking Immigrants: The Importance of Culture and Home Country Experiences.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2022Article
- Disparities in colorectal cancer screening among South Asians in New York City: a cross-sectional study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022Article
- Socioeconomic status and colorectal cancer screening behaviors in a vulnerable multiethnic population.Ethnicity & health · 2022Article
- A Population Health Equity Approach Reveals Persisting Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening in New York City South Asian Communities.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Article
- Decreased colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in a diverse urban population with increased colonoscopy screening.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Childhood adversity and physical health among Asian Indian emerging adults in the United States: Exploring disease-specific vulnerabilities and the role of anger.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2021Article
- Low Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake and Persistent Disparities in an Underserved Urban Population.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2020Article
- Article
- Disparities in colorectal cancer screening in New York City: An analysis of the 2014 NYC Community Health Survey.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsDisparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geography are well documented. We sought to further characterize the relationship between sociodemographic factors and up-to-date colonoscopy use in a diverse urban center using the 2014 New York City Community Health Survey (NYCCHS).
methodsWe examined overall colonoscopy uptake by race/ethnicity-with a particular interest in Asian and Hispanic subgroups-and used weighting to represent the entire 2014 NYC adult population. We also evaluated the association between 10 sociodemographic variables (age, sex, race/ethnicity, birthplace, home language, time living in the US, education, employment, income, and borough of residence) and colonoscopy use using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.
resultsUp-to-date colonoscopy uptake was 69% overall with reported differences by racial/ethnic group, ranging from 44%-45% for Mexicans and Asian Indians to 75% for Dominicans. In the multivariable regression model, colonoscopy use was associated with age greater than 65 years, Chinese language spoken at home, and not being in the labor force. Lower colonoscopy use was associated with living in the US for less than 5 years, Asian Indian language spoken at home, lower income, and residing outside of Manhattan.
conclusionsAmong New Yorkers older than age 50, up-to-date colonoscopy use varied significantly by race/ethnicity, especially in Asian and Hispanic subgroups. Recent immigrants, low-income groups, and those living outside of Manhattan were significantly less likely to receive CRC screening. Targeted interventions to promote CRC screening in these underserved groups may improve overall screening uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.