ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2019
Intensity of affective experience is modulated by magnitude of intracranial electrical stimulation in human orbitofrontal, cingulate and insular cortices.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting intracranial electrical stimulation to network regions defined within individuals causes network-level effects.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Convergent and selective representations of pain, appetitive processes, aversive processes, and cognitive control in the insula.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Functional Architecture of the Human Insula Revealed by Causal Intracranial Mapping.Research square · 2026Article
- Distributed Intracranial Activity Underlying Human Decision-making Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Direct stimulation of anterior insula and ventromedial prefrontal cortex disrupts economic choices.Nature communications · 2024Article
- The Neurostimulationist will see you now: prescribing direct electrical stimulation therapies for the human brain in epilepsy and beyond.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Review
- Symptomatic responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the cingulate cortex: Study of a cohort of epileptic patients and literature review.Human brain mapping · 2023Review
- Towards a pluralistic neurobiological understanding of consciousness.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023Review
- Case report: Ultrasound-guided median nerve electrical stimulation on functional recovery of hemiplegic upper limb after stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Causal mapping of human brain function.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022Review
- Temporal dynamics of affect in the brain: Evidence from human imaging and animal models.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022Review
- The Insula: A Stimulating Island of the Brain.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Does the Prefrontal Cortex Play an Essential Role in Consciousness? Insights from Intracranial Electrical Stimulation of the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Insula and Olfaction: A Literature Review and Case Report.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Intrinsic network architecture predicts the effects elicited by intracranial electrical stimulation of the human brain.Nature human behaviour · 2020Article
- Article
- A nonlinear relationship of evoked responses following charge-balanced single-pulse electrical stimulation with varying pulse widths.Brain stimulationArticle
- Subjective states induced by intracranial electrical stimulation matches the cytoarchitectonic organization of the human insula.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The subjective and behavioral effects of intracranial electrical stimulation (iES) have been studied for decades, but there is a knowledge gap regarding the relationship between the magnitude of electric current and the type, intensity and valence of evoked subjective experiences. We report on rare iES data from 18 neurosurgical patients with implanted intracranial electrodes in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), the insula (INS) and the anterior portion of cingulate cortex (ACC). ACC stimulation elicited somatic and visceral sensations, whereas OFC stimulation predominantly elicited olfactory and gustatory responses, and INS stimulation elicited a mix of effects involving somatic and visceral sensations, olfaction and gustation. Further, we found striking evidence that the magnitude of electric current delivered intracranially correlated positively with the perceived intensity of subjective experience and the evoked emotional state, a relationship observed across all three regions. Finally, we observed that the majority of reported experiences were negatively valenced and unpleasant, especially those elicited by ACC stimulation. The present study provides novel case studies from the human brain confirming that these structures contribute causally to the creation of affective states and demonstrates a direct relationship between the magnitude of electrical stimulation of these structures and the qualia of elicited subjective experience. Summary: This study provides critical knowledge about the effect of electrical charge magnitude on the intensity of human subjective experiences and emotional states. We shed light on the fundamental relationship between the electrical (physical) state of cortical tissue and the modality and intensity of human (subjective) experience. As electroceutical interventions are increasingly employed to treat neurological and psychiatric disorders, these findings highlight the importance of electrical stimulation magnitude for eliciting specific changes in human subjective experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.