ArticleeLife2019
Neural dynamics of visual ambiguity resolution by perceptual prior.
Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Common and distinct neural correlates of social interaction processing and theory of mind in narratives.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Determinants of visual ambiguity resolution.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Neural and computational mechanisms underlying one-shot perceptual learning in humans.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A Multimodal Framework for Understanding Perceptual Segmentation of Natural Scenes In Autism.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Wordsworth: A generative word dataset for comparison of speech representations in humans and neural networks.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Article
- Combined fMRI and eye-tracking evidence on the neural processing of visual ambiguity in photographic aesthetics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anticipatory and evoked visual cortical dynamics of voluntary temporal attention.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Network mechanisms of ongoing brain activity's influence on conscious visual perception.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Movement trajectories as a window into the dynamics of emerging neural representations.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Neural Mechanisms Determining the Duration of Task-free, Self-paced Visual Perception.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- Context-dependent neural preparation for information relevance vs. probability.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Towards a pluralistic neurobiological understanding of consciousness.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- Rethinking delusions: A selective review of delusion research through a computational lens.Schizophrenia research · 2022Review
- Cortical oscillatory dysrhythmias in visual snow syndrome: a magnetoencephalography study.Brain communications · 2022Article
- State-related neural influences on fMRI connectivity estimation.NeuroImage · 2021Review
- Long-term priors influence visual perception through recruitment of long-range feedback.Nature communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Past experiences have enormous power in shaping our daily perception. Currently, dynamical neural mechanisms underlying this process remain mysterious. Exploiting a dramatic visual phenomenon, where a single experience of viewing a clear image allows instant recognition of a related degraded image, we investigated this question using MEG and 7 Tesla fMRI in humans. We observed that following the acquisition of perceptual priors, different degraded images are represented much more distinctly in neural dynamics starting from ~500 ms after stimulus onset. Content-specific neural activity related to stimulus-feature processing dominated within 300 ms after stimulus onset, while content-specific neural activity related to recognition processing dominated from 500 ms onward. Model-driven MEG-fMRI data fusion revealed the spatiotemporal evolution of neural activities involved in stimulus, attentional, and recognition processing. Together, these findings shed light on how experience shapes perceptual processing across space and time in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.