ReviewJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2019
Cell therapy to improve regeneration of skeletal muscle injuries.
Review in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
97 citing papers in PubMed, 155 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α in Regulating Muscle Degeneration After Rotator Cuff Tears.The American journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Metabolomics-guided isolation of myogenic progenitor cells for improved transplantation.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of Impaired Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and Therapeutic Approaches in Aging and Chronic Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multifunctional scaffold based on TiMaterials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Epidemiology, Work-Up, and Management of Common Track and Field Injuries.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Recombinant ADAMTS‑1 promotes muscle regeneration accompanied by downregulation of Notch signaling.International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Mouse Models of Muscle Fibrosis: Mechanisms, Methods, and Applications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Biomimetic Scaffolds and Extracellular Matrix-Based Strategies for Myofiber Regeneration in Volumetric Muscle Loss.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Skeletal muscle reprogramming in peripheral nerve injury: mechanisms, therapeutic roles, and complication management.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Critical-Size Muscle Defect Regeneration Using an Injectable Cell-Laden Nanofibrous Matrix: An Ex Vivo Mouse Hindlimb Organ Culture Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Transplantation of adipose-derived stem cell aggregates via hydrogel microspheres that incorporate growth factors increases muscle strength.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Effect of Allogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injection on Functional Repair Outcomes Following Skeletal Muscle Laceration Injury.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Inter-Organ Crosstalk and Regulatory Mechanisms of Skeletal Muscle-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Systemic Metabolic Homeostasis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Review
- The effects of kinesiology taping on joint stability during descending stairs in patients with acute ankle injuries.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Biomaterials for Load-Bearing Tissue Interfaces: Sensor-Integrated Scaffolds and Mechanoadaptive Constructs for Skeletal Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Myogenic nano-adjuvant for orthopedic-related sarcopenia via mitochondrial homeostasis modulation in macrophage-myosatellite metabolic crosstalk.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Investigation of the efficiency of pulsed electromagnetic field treatment and stretching exercise in experimental skeletal muscle injury model.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Systemic Rejuvenating Interventions: Perspectives on Neuroinflammation and Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity.Neurochemical research · 2025Review
- Stem cell therapy: A promising therapeutic approach for skeletal muscle atrophy.World journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Restoration of skeletal muscle function via mesenchymal stem cells: mechanistic insights and therapeutic advances in myasthenia gravis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diseases that jeopardize the musculoskeletal system and cause chronic impairment are prevalent throughout the Western world. In Germany alone, ~1.8 million patients suffer from these diseases annually, and medical expenses have been reported to reach 34.2bn Euros. Although musculoskeletal disorders are seldom fatal, they compromise quality of life and diminish functional capacity. For example, musculoskeletal disorders incur an annual loss of over 0.8 million workforce years to the German economy. Among these diseases, traumatic skeletal muscle injuries are especially problematic because they can occur owing to a variety of causes and are very challenging to treat. In contrast to chronic muscle diseases such as dystrophy, sarcopenia, or cachexia, traumatic muscle injuries inflict damage to localized muscle groups. Although minor muscle trauma heals without severe consequences, no reliable clinical strategy exists to prevent excessive fibrosis or fatty degeneration, both of which occur after severe traumatic injury and contribute to muscle degeneration and dysfunction. Of the many proposed strategies, cell-based approaches have shown the most promising results in numerous pre-clinical studies and have demonstrated success in the handful of clinical trials performed so far. A number of myogenic and non-myogenic cell types benefit muscle healing, either by directly participating in new tissue formation or by stimulating the endogenous processes of muscle repair. These cell types operate via distinct modes of action, and they demonstrate varying levels of feasibility for muscle regeneration depending, to an extent, on the muscle injury model used. While in some models the injury naturally resolves over time, other models have been developed to recapitulate the peculiarities of real-life injuries and therefore mimic the structural and functional impairment observed in humans. Existing limitations of cell therapy approaches include issues related to autologous harvesting, expansion and sorting protocols, optimal dosage, and viability after transplantation. Several clinical trials have been performed to treat skeletal muscle injuries using myogenic progenitor cells or multipotent stromal cells, with promising outcomes. Recent improvements in our understanding of cell behaviour and the mechanistic basis for their modes of action have led to a new paradigm in cell therapies where physical, chemical, and signalling cues presented through biomaterials can instruct cells and enhance their regenerative capacity. Altogether, these studies and experiences provide a positive outlook on future opportunities towards innovative cell-based solutions for treating traumatic muscle injuries-a so far unmet clinical need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.