Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30843245›Full record

Trial reportAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2019

Randomised phase 3 trial: tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs. esomeprazole in patients with erosive oesophagitis.

Kwang Jae Lee, Byoung Kwan Son, Gwang Ha Kim, Hye-Kyung Jung, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Il-Kwun Chung, In-Kyung Sung, Jin Il Kim, Jong Hyeok Kim, Joon Seong Lee and 23 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Kwang Jae LeeSuwon, Korea.
Byoung Kwan SonSeoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9299-5476
Gwang Ha KimBusan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9721-5734
Hye-Kyung JungSeoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6653-5214
Hwoon-Yong JungSeoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1281-5859
Il-Kwun ChungCheonan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4158-3666
In-Kyung SungSeoul, Korea.
Jin Il KimSeoul, Korea.
Jong Hyeok KimAnyang, Korea.
Joon Seong LeeSeoul, Korea.
Joong Goo KwonDaegu, Korea.
Jung Ho ParkSeoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2568-128X
Kyu Chan HuhDaejeon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3746-8419
Kyung Sik ParkDaegu, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1874-9936
Moo-In ParkBusan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2071-6957
Nayoung KimSeongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9397-0406
Oh Young LeeSeoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6025-530X
Sam Ryong JeeBusan, Korea.
Sang Kil LeeSeoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0721-0364
Sei Jin YounCheongju, Korea.
Sung Kook KimDaegu, Korea.
Soo Teik LeeJeonju, Korea.
Su Jin HongBucheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2012-0360
Suck Chei ChoiIksan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1338-3306
Tae Nyeun KimDaegu, Korea.
Young Hoon YounSeoul, Korea.
Hyo Ju ParkSeoul, Korea.
Min Ja KangSeoul, Korea.
Chi Hye ParkSeoul, Korea.
Bong Tae KimSeoul, Korea.
Sangjun YounSeoul, Korea.
Geun Seog SongSeoul, Korea.
Poong-Lyul RheeSeoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0495-5296
Busan Medical Center · KRAnyang University · KRCheongju University · KRJeonju University · KRBucheon University · KRDaejeon University · KRKorea University of Technology and Education · KRSeonam University · KRSuwon Research Institute · KRWonkwang Digital University · KR

Funding

CJ Healthcare
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that has a fast onset of action and can control gastric pH for a prolonged period, which could offer clinical benefit in acid-related disorders.

aimTo confirm the non-inferiority of tegoprazan to esomeprazole in patients with erosive oesophagitis (EE).

methodsIn this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison study, 302 Korean patients with endoscopically confirmed EE (Los Angeles Classification Grades A-D) were randomly allocated to either tegoprazan (50 or 100 mg) or esomeprazole (40 mg) treatment groups for 4 or 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the cumulative proportion of patients with healed EE confirmed by endoscopy up to 8 weeks from treatment initiation. Symptoms, safety and tolerability were also assessed.

resultsThe cumulative healing rates at week 8 were 98.9% (91/92), 98.9% (90/91) and 98.9% (87/88) for tegoprazan 50 mg, tegoprazan 100 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg, respectively. Both doses of tegoprazan were non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg. The incidence of adverse events was comparable among the groups, and tegoprazan was well-tolerated.

conclusionOnce daily administration of tegoprazan 50 or 100 mg showed non-inferior efficacy in healing EE and tolerability to that of esomeprazole 40 mg.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Ulcer AgentsBenzene DerivativesDouble-Blind MethodEsomeprazoleEsophagitisFemaleHumansImidazolesMaleMiddle AgedPotassiumProton Pump InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeWound HealingAnti-Ulcer AgentsBenzene DerivativesEsomeprazoleImidazolesPotassiumProton Pump Inhibitorstegoprazan

Identifiers

PMID30843245
PMCPMC6594096
OpenAlexW2922114939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.