Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30843194›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2019

Physician age and the abandonment of episiotomy.

David H Howard, Jason Hockenberry

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Physician age and the abandonment of episiotomy.Health services research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David H HowardDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-4465-0414
Jason HockenberryDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether women treated by older physicians are more likely to undergo episiotomy. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingHospital discharge data from Pennsylvania for the period 1994 to 2010. STUDY

designWe examined the impact of the year in which physicians started delivering babies (a proxy for age) in Pennsylvania on episiotomy rates using a linear probability model with hospital fixed effects. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsUsing diagnosis and procedure codes, we identified women delivering vaginally (N = 1 658 327) and determined the proportion who had an episiotomy. PRINCIPAL

findingsThe average physician-level episiotomy rate declined from 54 percent in 1994 to 13 percent in 2010. Rates declined among older and younger physicians, but, at any point in time, women treated by older physicians were more likely to have an episiotomy. A 10-year difference in physician age is associated with a 6 percentage point increase in episiotomy rates.

conclusionsResults indicate that older physicians, who entered practice when episiotomy was common, were slow to adjust their practices in response to evidence showing that routine episiotomy is unnecessary.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsDelivery, ObstetricEpisiotomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'PregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSex FactorsSocioeconomic Factorsabandonmentchildbirthde-adoptionobstetric deliveryphysicians' practice patterns

Identifiers

PMID30843194
PMCPMC6505423
OpenAlexW2922364518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.