Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30843128›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2019

Similarity and differential NMR spectroscopy in metabolomics: application to the analysis of vegetable oils with

Jan Schripsema

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jan SchripsemaGrupo Metabolômica, Laboratório de Ciências Quimicas, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Av. Alberto Lamego, 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, 28013-602, Brazil. jan.schripsema@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5362-4074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn NMR based metabolomics there is a need for tools to easily compare spectra and to extract the maximum of information from the data.

objectivesThe calculation of similarity and performing differential NMR spectroscopy provides important additional information for classification and validation in metabolomics experiments.

methodsFrom 13 different vegetable oils samples were analysed by

resultsThe similarity between the individual spectra was calculated for the spectra of all samples. The similarity was used to verify and improve the alignment. For vegetable oils which showed a high similarity, e.g. chia seed oil and linseed oil, differential NMR spectroscopy was used to discover marker compounds.

conclusionsThe calculation of similarity is an important tool to reveal variability between samples and spectra and can be used to verify data sets and improve alignment or binning procedures. With differential spectroscopy marker compounds are easily discovered. The methods can be seen as an important addition to the routine procedures of metabolomics experiments.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkersMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolomicsPlant OilsSoftwareBiomarkersPlant Oils13C NMR1H NMRDifferential NMRFloating binsMarker compoundsMetabolomicsSimilarity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.