Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30842992›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2019

Some Differences in Nutritional Biomarkers are Detected Between Consumers and Nonconsumers of Organic Foods: Findings from the BioNutriNet Project.

Julia Baudry, Véronique Ducros, Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo, Pilar Galan, Serge Hercberg, Laurent Debrauwer, Marie Josèphe Amiot, Denis Lairon, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Organic Food Consumption and Perception among Polish Mothers of Children under 6 Years Old.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julia BaudryNutritional Epidemiology Research team (EREN), Paris 13 University, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Sorbonne Paris City Epidemiology and Statistics Center, Cnam, COMUE Sorbonne-Paris- City, Bobigny, France.
Véronique DucrosBiochemistry department, Grenoble-Alpes Hospital, Grenoble cedex 9, France.
Nathalie Druesne-PecolloNutritional Epidemiology Research team (EREN), Paris 13 University, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Sorbonne Paris City Epidemiology and Statistics Center, Cnam, COMUE Sorbonne-Paris- City, Bobigny, France.
Pilar GalanNutritional Epidemiology Research team (EREN), Paris 13 University, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Sorbonne Paris City Epidemiology and Statistics Center, Cnam, COMUE Sorbonne-Paris- City, Bobigny, France.
Serge HercbergNutritional Epidemiology Research team (EREN), Paris 13 University, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Sorbonne Paris City Epidemiology and Statistics Center, Cnam, COMUE Sorbonne-Paris- City, Bobigny, France.
Laurent DebrauwerToxalim, Université de Toulouse University, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Marie Josèphe AmiotMOISA, Université Montpellier University, CIRAD, CIHEAM-IAMM, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Denis LaironAix Marseille University, INSERM, INRA, Marseille, France.
Emmanuelle Kesse-GuyotNutritional Epidemiology Research team (EREN), Paris 13 University, Inserm (U1153), Inra (U1125), Sorbonne Paris City Epidemiology and Statistics Center, Cnam, COMUE Sorbonne-Paris- City, Bobigny, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9715-3534

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeta-analyses have compared the nutrient content of both organic and nonorganic foods. However, the impacts of such variations on human nutritional biomarkers still need to be assessed.

objectiveIn a nested clinical study from the NutriNet-Santé study, we aimed to compare the nutritional status of "organic" and "nonorganic" food consumers matched on a propensity score.

methodsBased on self-reported organic food consumption assessed through a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), 150 low and 150 high organic food consumers were selected with <10% or >50% of organic food in their diet, respectively (expressed as the proportion of organic food in the whole diet in g/d). Participants were matched using a propensity score derived from socio-demographic, food, and health variables. Fasting plasma samples were analyzed using acknowledged laboratory methods for measurements of iron status, magnesium, copper, cadmium, carotenoids, vitamins A and E, and fatty acids.

resultsWe found significant differences between low and high organic food consumers with similar dietary patterns, with respect to plasma concentrations of magnesium, fat-soluble micronutrients (α-carotene, β-carotene, lutein, and zeaxanthin), fatty acids (linoleic, palmitoleic, γ-linolenic, and docosapentanoeic acids), and some fatty acid desaturase indexes. No differences between the 2 groups were detected for plasma concentrations of iron, copper, cadmium, lycopene, β-cryptoxanthin, or vitamins A and E.

conclusionIf confirmed by other studies, our data suggest that a high consumption of organic foods, compared with very low consumption, modulates to some extent, the nutritional status of individuals with similar dietary patterns. Further research including prospective cohort studies is needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of such differences.

Indexed as

biomarkerscarotenoidsepidemiological studyfatty acidsmineralsorganic foodvitamins

Identifiers

PMID30842992
PMCPMC6397420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.