Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30842913›Full record

ArticleThe mental health clinician2019

Comparison of clozapine monitoring and adverse event management in a psychiatrist-only and a clinical pharmacist-psychiatrist collaborative clinic.

Samantha Maryan, Michelle Harms, Erin McAllister, Beth DeJongh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The mental health clinician, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samantha MaryanPostgraduate Year 1 Pharmacy Resident, Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-4250
Michelle HarmsMental Health Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4915-6810
Erin McAllisterMental Health Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2452-3282
Beth DeJonghPostgraduate Year 1 Pharmacy Resident, Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0964-3788
Milwaukee VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn an effort to establish clinical support for providers prescribing clozapine and to help reverse the national decline in clozapine utilization, a clinical pharmacist began seeing half the clozapine clinic patients, preceding the psychiatrist, at this facility in July 2017. The other half of the clozapine clinic patients continued being seen by the psychiatrist only. The purpose was to determine the impact of the pharmacist on clozapine management and identify barriers to clozapine use to potentially increase its utilization.

methodsBaseline data (clozapine dose, number of antipsychotics and other psychotropics, A1c, lipids, pulse, body mass index, weight, blood pressure, and number of medications for adverse effects) were collected via chart review from the first clinic visit and each follow-up visit. A provider survey was used to identify barriers and solutions to prescribing clozapine.

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences from baseline in patient outcomes between the collaborative and psychiatrist-only group. In the prepharmacist to postpharmacist analysis, there was a decrease in number of antipsychotics (-0.27 ± 0.65), number of other psychotropics (-0.18 ± 0.41), A1c (-0.04% ± 0.25%), clozapine dose (-7.96 mg ± 19.58 mg), and total cholesterol (-15.73 mg/dL ± 42.31 mg/dL). There were more pharmacologic (71 vs 19) and nonpharmacologic (154 vs 3) interventions documented in the collaborative group compared to the psychiatrist-only group. Eleven providers (69%) completed the survey. Providers' perception of patient refusal of monitoring was the barrier that received the most responses (54%). A pharmacist seeing every clozapine clinic patient was the solution that received the most responses (90%). DISCUSSION: Trends were seen for decreasing the number of antipsychotics, other psychotropics, A1c, and total cholesterol as well as an increased number of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions documented in the collaborative group. Providers identified that pharmacists seeing every clozapine clinic patient would be a solution to clozapine underutilization, which demonstrates the perceived value of pharmacist involvement.

Indexed as

clozapine clinicclozapine underutilizationpharmacist interventionpharmacist monitoring

Identifiers

PMID30842913
PMCPMC6398353
OpenAlexW2919067861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.