Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30842892›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

A data science challenge for converting airborne remote sensing data into ecological information.

Sergio Marconi, Sarah J Graves, Dihong Gong, Morteza Shahriari Nia, Marion Le Bras, Bonnie J Dorr, Peter Fontana, Justin Gearhart, Craig Greenberg, Dave J Harris and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sergio MarconiSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sarah J GravesSchool of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3805-4242
Dihong GongDepartment of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Morteza Shahriari NiaDepartment of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Marion Le BrasNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Bonnie J DorrNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Peter FontanaNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Justin GearhartSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Craig GreenbergNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Dave J HarrisDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3332-9307
Sugumar Arvind KumarDepartment of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Agarwal NishantDepartment of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Joshi PrarabdhDepartment of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sundeep U RegeDepartment of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Stephanie Ann BohlmanSchool of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ethan P WhiteDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6728-7745
Daisy Zhe WangDepartment of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida · USNational Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecology has reached the point where data science competitions, in which multiple groups solve the same problem using the same data by different methods, will be productive for advancing quantitative methods for tasks such as species identification from remote sensing images. We ran a competition to help improve three tasks that are central to converting images into information on individual trees: (1) crown segmentation, for identifying the location and size of individual trees; (2) alignment, to match ground truthed trees with remote sensing; and (3) species classification of individual trees. Six teams (composed of 16 individual participants) submitted predictions for one or more tasks. The crown segmentation task proved to be the most challenging, with the highest-performing algorithm yielding only 34% overlap between remotely sensed crowns and the ground truthed trees. However, most algorithms performed better on large trees. For the alignment task, an algorithm based on minimizing the difference, in terms of both position and tree size, between ground truthed and remotely sensed crowns yielded a perfect alignment. In hindsight, this task was over simplified by only including targeted trees instead of all possible remotely sensed crowns. Several algorithms performed well for species classification, with the highest-performing algorithm correctly classifying 92% of individuals and performing well on both common and rare species. Comparisons of results across algorithms provided a number of insights for improving the overall accuracy in extracting ecological information from remote sensing. Our experience suggests that this kind of competition can benefit methods development in ecology and biology more broadly.

Indexed as

Airborne remote sensingCrown delineationCrown segmentationData alignmentData science competitionNational Ecological Observatory NetworkRemote sensingSpecies classification

Identifiers

PMID30842892
PMCPMC6397763
OpenAlexW2810426430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.