Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30842883›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2019

Agreeing on global research priorities for medication safety: an international prioritisation exercise.

Aziz Sheikh, Igor Rudan, Kathrin Cresswell, Neelam Dhingra-Kumar, Mei Lee Tan, Minna L Häkkinen, Liam Donaldson, World Health Organization's Management Team on Research Priorities for Medication Safety

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Regional research priorities for medication safety and pharmacovigilance in gulf cooperation council countries: a modified Delphi consensus study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Is Post-Burn Scarring a Research Priority?European burn journal · 2022
    Article
  18. How to Build and Assess the Quality of Healthcare-Related Research Questions.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aziz SheikhUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Igor RudanUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Kathrin CresswellUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Neelam Dhingra-KumarWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mei Lee TanWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Minna L HäkkinenWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Liam DonaldsonWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization's Management Team on Research Priorities for Medication Safety
University of Edinburgh · GBWorld Health Organization · CHLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMedication errors continue to contribute substantially to global morbidity and mortality. In the context of the recent launch of the World Health Organization's (WHO) Third Global Patient Safety Challenge:

methodsWe undertook a consensus prioritisation exercise using an approach developed by the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative. Based on a combination of productivity and citations, we identified leading researchers in patient and medication safety and invited them to participate. We also extended the invitation to a further pool of experts from the WHO Global Patient Safety Network. All experts independently generated research ideas, which they then independently scored based on the criteria of: answerability, effectiveness, innovativeness, implementation, burden reduction and equity. An overall Research Priority Score and Average Expert Agreement were calculated for each research question.

findings131 experts submitted 333 research ideas, and 42 experts then scored the proposed research questions. The top prioritised research areas were: (1) deploying and scaling technology to enhance medication safety; (2) developing guidelines and standard operating procedures for high-risk patients, medications and contexts; (3) score-based approaches to predicting high-risk patients and situations; (4) interventions to increase patient medication literacy; (5) focused training courses for health professionals; and (6) universally applicable pictograms to avoid medication-related harm. Whilst there was a focus on promoting patient education and involvement across resource settings, priorities identified in high-resource settings centred on the optimisation of existing systems through technology. In low- and middle-resource settings, priorities focused on identifying systemic issues contributing to high-risk situations.

conclusionsWHO now plans to work with global, regional and national research funding agencies to catalyse the investment needed to enable teams to pursue these research priorities in medication safety across high-, middle- and low-resource country settings.

Indexed as

ConsensusGlobal HealthPatient SafetyHumansMedication ErrorsResearch

Identifiers

PMID30842883
PMCPMC6393844
OpenAlexW2919716552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.